Search Results for "arbitral award execution"

954 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 954 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Amendment Application in Arbitration Challenge Due to Delay and Lack of Diligence. Petitioner Failed to Show Justification for Incorporating New Ground 17 Months After Filing Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Zee Sports Limited (now Zee Digital Convergence Ltd.) seeking amendment to its Arbitration Petition chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Arbitration Dispute Over Saleable FSI and Possession of Property. Court restrains respondents from alienating saleable FSI and disturbing possession pending arbitration under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Atul Resorts and Hospitality India Pvt. Ltd. and Atul Projects India Ltd., filed two arbitration petitions under Section 9 of the Arb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Extra Overhead Expenses in Railway Contract Dispute — Clause 17(3) Bars Damages for Delay. The court held that the Arbitral Tribunal's award of compensation for delay was contrary to the express terms of the contract and the mutual shortclosure agreement.

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India (Petitioner) against an arbitral award dated 20th February 2007 passed by an Arbitral Tribunal in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows MTNL's Challenge to Arbitral Award in False Ceiling Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Award on Certain Claims but Sets Aside Award on Claim for Price Escalation Due to Lack of Evidence and Contrary to Contract Terms.

The petitioner, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL), challenged an arbitral award dated 29 March 2011 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Joint Venture Dispute — Arbitration Clause Survives Termination of Agreement. Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked for disputes arising from Joint Venture Agreement dated 28th March, 2007.

The applicant, M/s. Atul & Arkade Realty, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.

The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...