Search Results for "Supreme Court discretionary power"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Supreme Court discretionary power"

1772 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1772 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition Against Dismissal of Application to Set Aside Decree in Eviction Suit. Decree Passed Not Ex-Parte but Under Order XVII Rule 2 CPC, as Defendants Had Appeared Earlier and Failed to Appear at Subsequent Hearings Without Sufficient Cause.

17 Nov 2025

The dispute arose from an eviction suit filed by Kshtriya Dnyati Sabha, a registered public trust under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, against the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Non-Prosecution and Non-Payment of Court Fees in Copyright Dispute Over Film Script. Plaintiff failed to pay deficit court fee of Rs.2,50,000 and did not prosecute the suit after interim relief was denied.

27 Jan 2016

The plaintiff, Uday Singh Deshraj Rajput, filed Suit (L) No. 967 of 2013 in the Bombay High Court on 11 November 2013 seeking a declaration that he wa...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Against Remission of Arbitral Award for De Novo Consideration Due to Jurisdictional Error. Arbitrator Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Claims Not Raised Before Chief Engineer and Commissioner Under Contractual Pre-Arbitration Procedure.

24 Nov 2010

The appellant, Biwater Penstocks Ltd., a UK-based company, entered into a contract with the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (first respondent)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Notification Withdrawing Land from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After Possession Taken. Issue Concerns Whether Withdrawal Is Permissible When Acquisition Proceedings Had Attained Finality and Possession Was Taken Years Earlier.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute concerned the validity of a notification under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 withdrawing Survey No. 50 (6 acres 20 guntas) ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Whether Withdrawal of Land Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Permissible After Possession Had Already Been Taken. Dispute Centered on Notification Dated 12.04.2001 Withdrawing Acquisition of Survey No.50 Despite Prior Possession and Multiple Dismissals of Challenges by Land Owners.

1 Aug 2026

Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Bond Redemption Dispute, Upholding Defendant's Compliance with RBI Directives. Interest on Delayed Payment Not Payable Due to Regulatory Embargo and Pending Liquidation Proceedings Under Companies Act, 1956.

3 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from a suit filed by M/s. SIBCO Investment Pvt Ltd against Small Industries Development Bank of India seeking interest on alleged be...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 12656 OF 2023

8 Apr 2025

The writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. against the order dated 31 July ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Liberty to Withdraw Suit Under Order 23 Rule 1(3) CPC — Appeal Not Maintainable Under Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The order granting leave to withdraw with liberty to file fresh suit is not a 'judgment' under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and hence no appeal lies.

11 Mar 2022

The Appellant, Resilient Innovations Private Limited, filed an appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challenging an order of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Cancels Bail Granted Under Section 437(6) CrPC for Non-Completion of Trial Within 60 Days of Charge Framing. The court held that the Magistrate failed to consider the prosecution's application for further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC, which justified the delay in trial.

13 Nov 2006

The applicant, UT Worldwide India Pvt. Ltd., filed five criminal applications seeking cancellation of bail granted to respondent no. 2 (the accused) b...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appellants' Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Agreement of Sale Dated 21.4.2002 Proved by Plaintiff; Defendant's Legal Representatives Failed to Show Perversity in Lower Courts' Findings.

2 Jun 2017

The appellants, legal representatives of the original defendant in O.S. No. 216/2005, challenged the judgment and decree dated 18.7.2013 passed in R.A...

61 62 63 64 65

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)