APPEAL No. 331 of 2012
18 Sep 2012The dispute centered on the shareholding of Gharda Chemicals Ltd., a closely held company originally belonging to the Gharda and Kavasmaneck families....
Search Results for "Separate Legal Entity"
1036 result(s) found
Found 1036 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Detention of Goods under IGST: State Commercial Tax Officer Held to Have Jurisdiction Under Section 4 of IGST Despite No Separate Notification. Cross-Empowerment Under Section 4 of IGST Is Default Rule; No Separate Notification Required for State Officers' Jurisdiction Under IGST.
5 Mar 2025The Karnataka High Court considered a writ petition filed by a proprietorship concern challenging orders of extension of physical verification, confis...
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Catering Policy 2005 for Railway Minor Units. Petitioners Seek to Quash Policy and Extend Existing Licences Under Catering Policy 2000.
12 Apr 2006The petitions involved a challenge to the Catering Policy 2005 introduced by the Indian Railways for minor catering units at railway stations across v...
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Revision Order in Land Partition Dispute — Holds That Revenue Authorities Cannot Reopen Final Civil Court Decrees Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The court ruled that the revisional power under Section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 cannot be used to re-adjudicate a partition decree that attained finality in 1956, and that a delay of over 12 years in filing revision is fatal.
4 Nov 2025The Bombay High Court was hearing a batch of writ petitions challenging an order dated 27 September 2024 passed by the Minister (Revenue and Forest De...
- 105
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge to Solid Waste Management Tender; Petitioners Allege Clubbing of Wards Renders Small Contractors Ineligible. Case Raises Issues of Arbitrariness, Transparency, and Compliance with Ministry of Urban Development Manual Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
3 Nov 2025The dispute arose from a tender notification dated 30.07.2025 issued by the Bengaluru Solid Waste Management Limited (BSWML) for 33 packages covering ...
- 25
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Partnership Dispute Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Existence of Arbitration Clause in Reconstitution Deed Upheld. The court found that the reconstitution deed dated 23.2.2008 contained an arbitration clause, and thus appointed a sole arbitrator to resolve disputes between the partners.
20 Jul 2015The petitioner, Shri Prabhakar Reddy, a founder partner of M/s. Classic Enterprises, filed two civil miscellaneous petitions under Section 11(5)(6) of...
- 59
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals on Section 194H TDS Liability Against Distributors. Discounts to Channel Partners Held as Commission, Mandating Tax Deduction Under Agency Relationship.
14 Aug 2014The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of appeals by telecom companies challenging Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders confirming their liability ...
- 66
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore Hears Appeals by Telecom Companies Against Income Tax Department on TDS Liability. Multiple Appeals Filed Under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 Challenging ITAT Orders for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2008-09.
14 Aug 2014The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of Income Tax Appeals filed by telecom companies under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 196...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Discharge of Accused in Essential Commodities Act Case — Sanction Under Section 6A of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 Held Mandatory for Prosecution. The court upheld the Sessions Judge's order discharging the respondents for lack of valid sanction, ruling that prosecution without sanction is void.
15 Jan 2010The State of Maharashtra filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging the judgment and order dated 29/10/2002 passed by the Sessions Judge, Jalgaon in C...
- 74
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals, Upholding Tax Deduction at Source Under Section 194H on Discounts to Distributors. Relationship Between Telecom Companies and Distributors Held to Be Principal-Agent, Making Discounts Liable as Commission for Tax Deduction Purposes.
14 Aug 2014Multiple telecom companies, including Bharti Airtel Limited, Vodafone Essar South Limited, and Tata Teleservices Limited, filed appeals under Section ...
- 60
