KAHC010059832012_1
21 Jun 2016The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...
Search Results for "Larger Bench"
4034 result(s) found
Found 4034 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Public Interest Litigation Concerning Recruitment and Selection Process. Petition Challenges Appointments Made by State Authorities Alleging Irregularities in Selection.
21 Jun 2016The judgment text provided is incomplete, containing only the case heading, date, court, judges, advocates, and a list of parties. The matter is a wri...
- 83
High Court
- 56
High Court
- 60
High Court
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Decides on Validity of Preventive Detention Orders Under Maharashtra Dangerous Activities Act for Fixing One-Year Detention Period. Detention Orders Challenged as Contrary to Supreme Court Precedent Prohibiting Fixing Maximum Period Without Periodic Review.
13 Oct 2017The Bombay High Court heard three criminal writ petitions together as they involved a common question of law regarding preventive detention orders pas...
- 65
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Division Bench Order on Limitation in Suit for Cancellation of Settlement Agreement. The Court held that in view of the repeal of Section 9A CPC (Maharashtra Amendment) and the judgment in Nusli Neville Wadia, the merits of the limitation issue need not be decided at this stage.
13 Dec 2019The case involves a dispute over 75,001 shares of Bombay Oxygen Investments Ltd. (BOIL). The appellants (Ruias) and respondent No.3 (MGG) entered into...
- 148
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds Amendment to Section 26 of Bombay Civil Courts Act Prospective, Not Applicable to Pending Appeals. Amendment increasing pecuniary jurisdiction of District Court from Rs.1 lakh to Rs.5 lakh does not apply to appeals already filed before the amendment came into force.
22 Feb 2012The Bombay High Court considered a reference arising from a learned Single Judge's order dated 4 March 2011, which formulated two questions regarding ...
- 98
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Constitutional Challenge to COFEPOSA Preventive Detention Powers for Foreign Exchange Violations. Petitioners Contend Absence of Penal Provisions Under FEMA Renders Section 3(1) Unconstitutional.
1 Aug 2026The writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed directly in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3(1)...
- 54
