Search Results for "Bombay High Court guidelines"

3107 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3107 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Whether Public Projects in CRZ-I Mangrove Buffer Zone Require Prior Court Permission Under BEAG Order; Construction of Jetties Requires Compliance with CRZ Notification 2011 and Environmental Clearances.

The matter arose from three writ petitions filed by Maharashtra Maritime Board, a statutory board established under the Maharashtra Maritime Board Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition for Illegal Detention Without Production on Remand Date. Failure to Produce Accused Physically or Virtually on 22 March 2022 Renders Remand Order Invalid and Detention Illegal.

The petitioner, Sushil Lohiya, filed a habeas corpus petition on behalf of his son Brijesh Lohiya, who was an accused in an offence registered under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Externment Orders Under Maharashtra Police Act — Clarifies Conditions for Section 56(1)(a) and (b) and Requirement of Witness Fear. The court held that each clause has distinct requirements and the authority must apply mind to proportionality and natural justice.

The judgment concerns three criminal writ petitions challenging externment orders passed under Section 56(1)(a) and (b) of the Maharashtra Police Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes Sanction Order in Disproportionate Assets Case Against IRS Officer — Sanctioning Authority Failed to Apply Independent Mind and Relied on CBI Report Without Proper Application of Mind.

The petitioner, Vivek Batra, an Indian Revenue Service officer, challenged the sanction order dated 09.10.2012 granted by the Union of India for his p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Against Politician for Alleged Disproportionate Assets — No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Petitioner failed to provide credible material to justify investigation under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, an RTI activist, filed a PIL in the Bombay High Court alleging that respondent 9, a politician and former Home Minister of Maharashtra...