Search Results for "Andheri East"

723 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 723 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Duty Recovery Case — Customs Authorities Cannot Recover Duty Dehors Sections 28 and 125 of Customs Act, 1962. Duty on Confiscated Goods Not Recoverable When Redemption Option Not Exercised.

The Bombay High Court, in an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, considered two substantial questions of law: whether customs authoriti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Diploma Engineering Admission Eligibility Criteria. Rule requiring minimum 50% marks in PCM for second year admission upheld as valid and not arbitrary.

The petitioners, including Raju Gajanan Koparde, Nandita Milind Karoor, Kantilal Jainarayan Singhal, and others, filed writ petitions challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Salary Parity for Shikshan Sevak in Primary School. Held that Shikshan Sevaks are entitled to salary at par with regular teachers from the date of their appointment, following earlier decisions.

The petitioner, Shrikant Adyaprasad Tiwari, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court seeking salary parity with regular teachers. He was app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act to Appoint Arbitrator Despite Alleged Non-Payment of Stamp Duty on Agreement. Court holds that stamp duty is a fiscal matter and not a bar to appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Lloyds Realty Developers Limited, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MIDC Plot Allotments — No Arbitrariness Found in Allotment Process. Petitioner's claim for allotment based on alleged earmarking fails as no legal right established.

The petitioner, Vikrant Industries, a sole proprietorship, filed a writ petition under Articles 226, 14, and 19 of the Constitution of India challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition for Lack of Bona Fides and Substantial Defence. Company's claim of disputed debt and pending civil suit found to be a bona fide defence against winding up under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, M/s. Joshi Bullion Gems & Jewellery Pvt. Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 again...