Search Results for "Age proof"

4188 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4188 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows BEST's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Reduces Compensation for Pan Shop Owner. Court holds that notional income for self-employed person with no proof of income should be based on minimum wage guidelines, and reduces compensation from Rs. 13,50,073 to Rs. 9,00,000.

The case involves an appeal filed by the Bombay Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence and Unreliable Hearsay Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ambaji @ Nana Hanmant Patil, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur for the murder of Ganpati Dattu Jadhav under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Eviction Decree in Favor of Public Trust for Temple Construction. Concurrent findings of maintainability, authority of trustee, and bona fide need upheld under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The petitioners, tenants of a shop block admeasuring 700 sq. ft. belonging to respondent no.1 Public Trust, challenged concurrent eviction decrees pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Complaint Against Wife in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. No Evidence of Consent or Connivance by Joint Account Holder Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, Ashish C. Shah, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Aarif Ali Yusuf Ali Sayyad, was convicted by the Special Judge, Dhule, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Cor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Failure to Prove Title and Possession. Court upholds dismissal of suit for declaration of ownership and injunction based on insufficient evidence of title and possession under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellants, Noorjahan and others, filed a suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction against the respondents in respect of a prope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Invalidation of Kunabi Caste Claim for OBC Reservation. Petitioner failed to prove caste status and community acceptance, leading to disqualification from reserved Gram Panchayat seat.

The petitioner, Atul Tukaram Patil, contested the election for the post of Member of Gram Panchayat from ward no.6 of village Rashiwade, Taluka Radhan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Cancellation of Approval for Physical Education Teacher in Aided School — Violation of Natural Justice. Education Officer's Order Cancelling Alleged Approval Without Notice Set Aside; Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration After Hearing.

The petitioner, Ashok Satram Honmane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bomb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nivrutti s/o Ganpati Sadekar, was a Junior Assistant in the Education Department of Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The complainant, Balaji...