High Court Quashes Cancellation of Approval for Physical Education Teacher in Aided School — Violation of Natural Justice. Education Officer's Order Cancelling Alleged Approval Without Notice Set Aside; Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration After Hearing.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 10
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ashok Satram Honmane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the order dated 6.12.1999 passed by the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Parbhani, which cancelled the alleged approval order dated 11.11.1999 granted in his favour. The petitioner sought quashing of the cancellation order and a mandatory direction to the respondent No.2 to recognize and approve him as Physical Education Teacher w.e.f. 14.6.1999 and to pay his salary. The petitioner was appointed as Physical Education Teacher by the school (respondents No.3 and 4) on 4.6.1999 w.e.f. 14.6.1999. The school was a recognized and aided institution. The petitioner claimed that the Education Officer had granted approval on 11.11.1999, but later cancelled it on 6.12.1999 without any notice or opportunity of hearing. The respondents No.1 and 2 (State and Education Officer) opposed the petition, arguing that the approval was never granted and the alleged approval letter was forged. The respondents No.3 and 4 (school management) supported the petitioner. The court examined the record and found that the cancellation order was passed without any notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, which violated principles of natural justice. The court held that even if the approval was not granted, the cancellation order could not stand without hearing the petitioner. The court quashed the order dated 6.12.1999 and directed the Education Officer to decide the petitioner's claim for approval afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties, within three months from the date of the order.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Cancellation of Approval - Opportunity of Hearing - The Education Officer cancelled the alleged approval granted to the petitioner without issuing any notice or giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner - Held that such cancellation order is in gross violation of principles of natural justice and is liable to be quashed and set aside (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order dated 6.12.1999 cancelling the alleged approval granted to the petitioner as Physical Education Teacher was passed in violation of principles of natural justice and without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The order dated 6.12.1999 passed by the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Parbhani is quashed and set aside. The Education Officer is directed to decide the petitioner's claim for approval afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties, within three months from the date of the order.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • opportunity of hearing
  • cancellation of approval without notice
  • writ of certiorari
  • Article 226 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (10) 16

Writ Petition No.4000 of 2004

2017-10-05

R.D. Dhanuka, Sunil K. Kotwal

Shri R.J. Godbole for petitioner, Mrs. M.A. Deshpande for respondents No.1 & 2, Shri S.R. Barlinge for respondents No.3 & 4

Ashok s/o Satram Honmane

The State of Maharashtra, Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Parbhani, Ganga Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Yeshwant Madhyamik Vidyalaya

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging cancellation of approval for appointment as Physical Education Teacher.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order dated 6.12.1999 cancelling approval and direction to recognize and approve petitioner as Physical Education Teacher w.e.f. 14.6.1999 and pay salary.

Filing Reason

The Education Officer cancelled the alleged approval granted to the petitioner without any notice or opportunity of hearing.

Issues

Whether the cancellation order dated 6.12.1999 was passed in violation of principles of natural justice.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the approval was granted on 11.11.1999 and cancelled without any notice or hearing. Respondents No.1 and 2 argued that no approval was ever granted and the alleged approval letter was forged.

Ratio Decidendi

An order cancelling an approval without affording any opportunity of hearing to the affected party is in gross violation of principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained.

Judgment Excerpts

The order dated 6.12.1999 passed by the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Parbhani cancelling the alleged approval order dated 11.11.1999 is in gross violation of principles of natural justice. The impugned order is quashed and set aside.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.4000 of 2004 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the order dated 6.12.1999. The court reserved judgment on 27th September 2017 and pronounced on 5th October 2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Quashes Cancellation of Approval for Physical Education Teacher in Aided School — Violation of Natural Justice. Education Officer's Order Cancelling Alleged Approval Without Notice Set Aside; Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration After...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Scheduled Tribe Certificate for 'Mannewar' Tribe — Failure to Consider Pre-Constitutional Documents and Affidavits of Relatives Constitutes Violation of Natural Justice. The Court remi...