Search Results for "wrong rule"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "wrong rule"

5024 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5024 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Owner's Impleadment in Licensee's Suit Against Municipal Corporation for Demolition. Owner is a necessary party under Order I Rule 10 CPC as the suit directly affects the owner's right to property and the owner has a right to be heard before any order affecting his property is passed.

29 Nov 2023

The case involves a reference to a larger bench of the Bombay High Court to resolve a conflict of views among single judges regarding whether the owne...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Restoration of Suit Despite Plaint Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11(f) CPC — Power to Restore Exists Under Order VII Rule 13 CPC. The Court held that rejection under Order VII Rule 11(f) is not a decree and the Trial Court has jurisdiction to restore the suit upon sufficient cause being shown.

12 Sep 2017

The case arises from a dispute between family members over property. The Plaintiff (Respondent No.1) filed Special Civil Suit No.30/2012 seeking parti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeals in Bihar Staff Selection Commission Examination Dispute — Expert Committee Report Accepted for Correcting Answers. The Court upheld the validity of increased vacancies and candidates, and directed revision of results based on expert opinion while protecting existing appointees.

6 May 2020

The case pertains to a dispute arising from the Graduate Level Combined Examination-2010 conducted by the Bihar Staff Selection Commission (BSSC) for ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Professor's Petition, Quashes Recovery from Gratuity and Pension. Recovery of Rs.8,43,782/- from retiral benefits set aside as employer failed to prove misrepresentation or fraud by employee, and recovery from pension/gratuity is impermissible under settled law.

25 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Ganesh Sitaram Magar, a retired Ayurved professor, challenged the recovery of Rs.8,43,782/- from his gratuity and pension benefits. He...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Direction for Registration of Crime Against Investigating Officer in NDPS Case for Lack of Jurisdiction. Special Judge's Order to Initiate Criminal Action Against IO for Delay in Filing Charge Sheet Set Aside as Without Authority of Law and in Violation of Natural Justice.

21 Apr 2023

The applicant, Ashish Devidas Morkhade, a Police Sub-Instructor, was the investigating officer in Crime No.318/2021 registered under Sections 20(b) an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition in Redevelopment Dispute — Dissenting Member Cannot Obstruct Majority Decision for Dilapidated Building. Court Appoints Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to Resolve Dispute Between Developer, Society, and Dissenting Member.

12 Mar 2021

The Bombay High Court dealt with an arbitration petition filed by Chirag Infra Projects Pvt Ltd, the developer, against Vijay Jwala Cooperative Housin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Bail in Gambling Case — Applicants Not Named in FIR, Bail Granted Suo Motu by Magistrate Could Not Be Cancelled Without Proper Grounds. The Court held that cancellation of bail requires strong reasons such as tampering with evidence or fleeing from justice, and mere addition of Section 420 IPC without substantive evidence does not constitute sufficient ground.

26 Sep 2012

The applicants, Uttamkumar and Madhukar Wagh, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes FIR in Rash Driving Case Based on Compromise Between Parties. Offences Under Sections 279, 338, 504 IPC Held to Be Non-Serious and Compoundable with Court's Permission, Allowing Quashing in the Interest of Justice.

1 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Padmanabh Rawal, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No....

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Summons Issued Under Section 160 CrPC for Production of Documents Beyond Territorial Jurisdiction. Investigating Agency Cannot Summon Person Residing Outside Police Station Limits for Document Production Under Section 160 CrPC; Proper Remedy Lies Under Section 91 CrPC.

20 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Shri Anirudha S. Bhagat, a resident of Mumbai, challenged summonses issued by the Investigating Agency in Daman under Section 160 of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Amendment of Complaint in NI Act Case - Typographical Error Correction Allowed. The court held that amendment to correct date and amount in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, after plea of not guilty, is permissible as it does not change the nature of the case.

10 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Madan Tulshiram Hembade, was the accused in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed by the respon...

60 61 62 63 64

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)