INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1767 OF 2020
3 Nov 2025...
Search Results for "substantial implementation"
1139 result(s) found
Found 1139 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Employer in Contract Labour Abolition Case. Termination of Contract Workers After Expiry of Contract Period Does Not Violate Interim Order as Order Only Maintained Status Quo During Pendency of Writ Petition.
18 Feb 2005The petitioner, General Employees Association, a registered trade union under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, representing contract labourers employed by ...
- 268
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.
17 Oct 2005The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...
- 238
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.
20 Mar 2013The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...
- 126
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Sales Tax Incentive Scheme Withdrawal — No Promissory Estoppel Against Policy Change in Public Interest. The court held that the withdrawal of a general sales tax incentive scheme by the State Government was valid and not violative of promissory estoppel or legitimate expectation.
30 Nov -0001The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by industrial units (M/s. Vidarbha Winding Wires Ltd., M/s. Chandrapur Vidyut Conductors Private Ltd....
- 99
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal on Limitation Issue — Show Cause Notice Held Time-Barred. The relevant date for computing limitation under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 for recovery of duty in case of provisional assessment is the date of refund order or refund cheque, not the date of credit into government treasury.
1 Mar 2006The appellant, M/s Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Limited, filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the order of the Customs, ...
- 110
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. Court upholds demolition of structures built without valid permission under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, holding that no prior notice is required when construction is patently illegal.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, AM Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of certain structures by the Municipal Corporation...
- 249
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Full Back-Wages for Illegal Termination of Workman. Employer's Denial of Employment Relationship Rejected Based on Documentary Evidence and Conduct.
22 Aug 2014The case involves a writ petition filed by Tekchand Khanchandani, proprietor of Vikas Garments, challenging a Labour Court award dated 8 June 2006. Th...
- 197
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Owner's Application to Vacate Arrest of Vessel in Bunker Supply Dispute. Maritime Lien for Bunkers Supplied to Bareboat Charterer Attaches to Vessel Irrespective of Ownership.
17 Dec 2014The plaintiff, Peninsula Petroleum Ltd., an Irish company, filed an admiralty suit claiming unpaid price for bunkers supplied to the vessel m.v. Geowa...
- 113
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 14 and 17 of Maharashtra Slum Act in Land Acquisition Challenge. Challenge to Acquisition Under Section 14 and Award Under Section 17 Rejected as Provisions Held Intra Vires Constitution.
16 Jan 2015The petitioners, Nenshi Monji (Bombay), a Family Trust and Others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the acquisi...
- 130
