Search Results for "panch witness admission"

886 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 886 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. Trial Court's Findings Not Perverse; Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302 and 498A of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No.211 of 1992, which acquitted De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal of Accused in Rape Case Under Sections 342 and 376 IPC. Prosecution Failed to Establish Identity of Accused and Corroborate Testimony of Minor Victim.

The State of Maharashtra challenged the acquittal of Ravindra Kashinath Ghodke by the First Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, in Sessions Case...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder Based on Eye-Witness Testimony — Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Sustained Despite Minor Contradictions in Evidence.

The appellant, Anil Raju Kiratkudwe, was convicted by the Trial Court for the murder of Kiran Bhise under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life impris...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Failure to Prove Chain of Circumstances Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 120-B, 203 IPC Set Aside Due to Lack of Motive and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence.

The appellant, Dinesh Thakare, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Chandrapur, for the murder of his wife Harsha under Sections 302, 201, 120-B and 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Udaykumar Kisan Velonde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 210 of 2011 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Benefit of Doubt. Conviction under Sections 363, 366-A, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Lahu Bhausaheb Sonwane, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur, for offences under Sections 363, 366-A, and 376 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Teacher for Rape of Minor Student Under Sections 366(A), 376(2)(f) and 506 IPC. The court found the victim's testimony credible and corroborated by medical evidence, dismissing the appeal.

The appellant, Nana @ Sandeep Tukaram Shinde, was a teacher at Adarsh School in Rahimatpur, Satara. The victim, a 12-year-old girl studying in 5th sta...