Search Results for "oral modification"

1202 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1202 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment for Recovery of Goods Sold and Delivered in Commercial Dispute. Defendant's Failure to File Affidavit in Reply and Admission of Liability Leads to Decree Under Order XXXVII CPC.

The plaintiff, Dongreen Resins & Chemicals Private Limited, filed a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Proof of Income and Negligence. The court held that the Tribunal erred in fixing income of the deceased without evidence and in not considering contributory negligence.

The case involves an appeal by the National Insurance Company Ltd. against the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Aurangabad ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sitaram S/o. Baliram Fating, a retired Maintenance City Survey Officer, was convicted by the Special Court (A.C.B.), Nagpur, in Special...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Invalidity of Thakur Scheduled Tribe Certificate - Scrutiny Committee Directed to Reconsider Claim with Proper Application of Mind and Affidavit Evidence

The petitioner, Ravindra Pralhadrao Khare, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee that inva...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals by Developer in Possession Suits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 100 CPC. Suits for possession based on title and prior possession were decreed; no substantial question of law arose.

The appellant, M/s. Samruddhi Developers, a partnership firm, filed four second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Over Notice Under Section 478 of BPMC Act. Repair Work by Appellant Not Covered by Section 478 as It Was Not Urgent or Necessary for Safety.

The appellant, Ashok Ambadas Gangane, filed two second appeals against the respondents, M/s. Shubhamangal Builders and Others, and Pune Municipal Corp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Guardianship Case — Child's Welfare Paramount. Consent of Biological Parents and Child's Best Interests Justify Granting Guardianship to Prospective Adoptive Parents Under Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.

The case involves an appeal against an order of a learned single Judge dated 30th November 2004 dismissing the appellants' petition for guardianship. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding that Senior Engineer and Engineering Assistant are Not Workmen under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Petitioners' Complaints under MRTU & PULP Act Dismissed as Not Maintainable Due to Lack of Workman Status.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the Labour Court's orders dated 23rd July 1999, which held that the Petitioners were no...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Court Receiver's Report and Additional Report in Land Dispute — Directs Demarcation and Removal of Encroachments. Court upholds Receiver's authority to manage suit property and take steps to protect it from unauthorized development.

The case pertains to a long-standing dispute over land survey No.34/1 and 35/3 at Panchpakhadi, Thane. The appellants had challenged a trial court ord...