Search Results for "enabling proviso"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "enabling proviso"

883 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 883 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fee Upon Withdrawal of Suit Under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Court Fee Deposited at Time of Filing. The court held that the proviso to Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC mandates refund of court fee when a suit is withdrawn unconditionally, and the trial court's rejection of the refund application was erroneous.

19 Aug 2025

The petitioner, Bindu Balakrishna Patali, filed a suit (Com. O.S. 150/2024) before the LXXXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Commercial Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Promotions of Education Extension Officers — Seniority and Reservation Rules Upheld. Petitioners failed to establish violation of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Service) Rules, 1969 in promotions of respondents.

2 Jul 2010

The petitioners, five individuals initially appointed as Assistant Teachers in Zilla Parishad schools, challenged the promotion of Respondent Nos.5 to...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Against Subsistence Allowance Order in De Novo Enquiry. Employee dismissed after departmental enquiry is entitled to subsistence allowance during de novo proceedings before Labour Court under Model Standing Orders.

24 Jan 2011

The petitioner, Mumbai Cricket Association, challenged an order of the 12th Labour Court, Bombay, dated 15th October 2010, which directed the payment ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Competing Kerosene Dealer for Lack of Locus Standi. Mere Competitor Not a Person Aggrieved Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

1 Oct 2012

The appellant, Rajendra Agrawal, a semi-wholesale kerosene dealer in Murtizapur, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the order of a Single Judge dis...

High Court

High Court Dismisses RTI Petition Seeking GST Returns of Third Parties — Information Held Confidential Under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act, 2005. Disclosure of commercial tax returns of six firms denied as personal information not related to any public activity.

14 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Adarsh S/o Gautam Pimpare, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses RTI Petition Seeking GST Returns of Third Parties — Information Denied as Personal and Confidential Under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act, 2005. The court held that GST returns filed by firms are personal information relating to commercial confidence and trade secrets, and disclosure requires consent or proof of larger public interest.

14 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Adarsh S/o Gautam Pimpare, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challenging orders passed by the Jan Mahit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Against Civil Suit for Medical Negligence Despite Prior Consumer Forum Dismissal. Principle of Res Judicata Not Applicable to Consumer Forum Decisions Under Section 9 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

15 Oct 2019

The case involves a dispute over medical negligence leading to the death of a baby boy. The respondents (parents) initially filed a complaint before t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action in Gadchiroli-Chimur Lok Sabha Constituency Dispute. Alleged Discrepancy of 62 Votes in Final Tally Does Not Constitute a Cause of Action Under Section 100(1)(d)(iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

25 Nov 2019

The petitioner, Dr. Rameshkumar Bapuraoji Gajbe, contested the election to the 17th Lok Sabha from the Gadchiroli-Chimur Constituency as a candidate o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 27(3) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Summary Trial for Non-Compliance Upheld. Section 27(3) is a complete code and does not violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

18 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Shri A. G. Sawant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Offence Under Section 185 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is Non-Cognizable but Police May Arrest Without Warrant if Offence Committed in Presence. Driving Under Influence of Alcohol is a Serious Offence but Classification Under Part II of First Schedule CrPC Makes it Non-Cognizable as Punishment is Less Than Three Years.

28 Nov 2013

The applicant, Ms. Rani Shashank Doshi, was driving a motor vehicle on 27 April 2011 when she was stopped by a police officer from N.M. Joshi Marg Pol...

60 61 62 63 64

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)