Search Results for "dangerous activities"

759 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 759 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order in Maharashtra Police Act Case — Failure to Consider Acquittals. Acquittals in Underlying Offences Not Considered by Authority Renders Externment Order Unsustainable Under Section 56(1)(a)(b) of Maharashtra Police Act.

The petitioner, Asgar @ Azhar Khan @ Bablu Don Safdar Khan, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order in Maharashtra Police Act Case Due to Lack of Live Link and Inordinate Delay. Order under Section 55(1) set aside as show cause notice issued over a year after last incident and no fresh crime registered during the gap.

The petitioners, Narayan Sitaram Pawar and Shantaram Narayan Pawar, challenged an externment order dated 15.12.2022 passed by the Superintendent of Po...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Maharashtra Police Act for Lack of Continuous Activity. Single FIR for Offences Under Indian Penal Code Not Sufficient to Invoke Section 56(1)(bb) of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.

The petitioner, Aamna Bi Shiekh Pir Mohd Sheikh, challenged an externment order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone 3, Nagpur, under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Eris Lifesciences in Trademark Infringement Case. Phonetic Similarity Between 'NEBISTAR' and 'NEBISTOL' Leads to Restraint Order Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Lupin Limited, filed a suit alleging that the Defendants, Eris Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd. and others, were infringing its registered tradem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Quashing Preventive Detention Order for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Article 22(5). The court held that failure to communicate grounds of detention in a language understood by the detenu renders the detention illegal.

The petitioner, Yashoda, wife of the detenu Keshava Poojary @ Choni, filed a writ petition for habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Known Language. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) Violated as Grounds Were Not Communicated in Tulu, a Language Known to Detenu.

The petitioner, Yashoda, wife of Keshava Poojary @ Choni, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Quashing Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA for Procedural Violations. Non-Supply of Documents and Delay in Considering Representation Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Shri Mohammed Tanveer Pariyani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of Habeas Corpus to quash t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Detention Under MPDA Act — Preventive Detention Upheld as Legally Valid. Court holds that subjective satisfaction of detaining authority based on credible material is sufficient and not vitiated by delay in disposal of representation.

The case involves a criminal writ petition filed by 23 petitioners challenging their detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activitie...