Search Results for "cognizance versus charge"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "cognizance versus charge"

1080 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1080 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Convicts Directors for Default in Filing Statement of Affairs Under Section 454(5) of Companies Act, 1956 — Failure to Submit Statement Despite Repeated Court Orders and Notices Constitutes Offence Without Reasonable Excuse.

1 Oct 2025

The Official Liquidator of M/s. Geeta Marine Services Pvt. Ltd. filed a complaint under Section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 1956 against four accused...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Territorial Jurisdiction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Jurisdiction Lies Where Cheque Is Presented for Collection. The court held that under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the place where the cheque is presented for collection is a relevant factor for territorial jurisdiction, and the Magistrate at Mumbai had jurisdiction as the cheques were deposited there.

14 Jun 2013

The petitioners, Sharda Polycolours Private Limited and its directors, were accused in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Permanent Cancellation of College Recognition for Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice and Final Order Must Be Passed by Same Authority Under Section 38 of Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University Act, 1998.

14 Aug 2013

The petitioners, a Public Trust and a College run by it, challenged the order dated 25.10.2012 permanently cancelling the recognition granted to the p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Contempt Reference Against Defendants for Willful Disobedience of Court Orders in Small Causes Suit. Failure to Furnish Particulars Despite Repeated Directions Constitutes Civil Contempt Under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

4 Apr 2006

This case involves a reference made by the Small Causes Judge, Mumbai, to the Bombay High Court under Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Criminal Complaint in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Compliance with Conditional Order. Petitioner's right to prosecute respondent for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 revived after respondent failed to deposit amount as directed.

4 May 2006

The petitioner, Anil Prabhakar Naik, filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondents for ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition of Cooperative Society Seeking Division of Assets Under Section 79 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. Court Holds That Section 79 Does Not Apply to Division of Assets After Bifurcation Under Section 18C, and Petitioner Must Seek Implementation of Government Order.

7 Nov 2014

The petitioner, a cooperative society registered for the Bhandara district, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against HR Managers in Workplace Harassment Case — Allegations of Outraging Modesty Under Sections 354, 509 IPC Not Made Out. Court Held That Absence of Sexual Overtone or Physical Contact Renders FIR Unsubstantiated, Abuse of Process of Law.

16 Dec 2025

The petitioners, six individuals employed as HR managers and executives in a private company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Act Order for Police Aid — No Locus Standi for Borrower's Partner After Property Sold to Third Party. The Court held that once the secured asset is sold and possession handed over to the auction purchaser, the borrower or its partner has no right to challenge the Section 14 order, and the remedy lies before the DRT under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.

9 Oct 2015

The petitioners, M/s. National Laminate Corporation (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Jayantilal L. Nisar, filed a writ petition under Article ...

Supreme Court

Quashing of FIR Set Aside — Supreme Court Reiterates Limits of Section 482 CrPC in Property Fraud Cases.

8 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court set aside the Madras High Court’s order quashing criminal proceedings arising from alleged fraudulent settlement deeds in a fa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Working Hours Provisions in Motor Transport Workers Act. Court upholds sections 13 and 16 of Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 as constitutionally valid and not violative of Articles 14 and 21.

24 Oct 2016

The petitioner, BEST Worker's Union, claiming to be an approved and representative union for employees in the transport section of Brihanmumbai Electr...

60 61 62 63 64

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)