Search Results for "Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act"

904 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 904 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Final Voters List in Cooperative Sugar Factory Election Due to Inclusion of Dead Members. Court Directs Re-examination of Provisional List by Local Authorities Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioners, members of Raosahebdada Pawar Ghodganga Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. (respondent no.3), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment for Temple Construction — No Public Interest Violation Found. Court held that allotment of land for a temple under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code does not require public auction and is permissible for religious purposes.

The judgment pertains to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Bapu Shankar Dighe and Dadasaheb Kusabapu Pawar, challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Public Servants in Misappropriation Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Acts Alleged Were in Discharge of Official Duty, Making Sanction Mandatory.

The petitioners, who were public servants working as Junior Engineer, Assistant Account Officer, Gram Sevak, and Junior Engineer in Panchayat Samiti U...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where courts below have concurrently found that plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession.

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of certain immovable property. The trial court d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Woman Sarpanch. Interpretation of First Proviso to Section 35(3) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 requires both that the Sarpanch be a woman and that the office be reserved for women.

The appellant, Rohini w/o Sanjay Bhosale, filed a Letters Patent Appeal before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) against the order of a learned...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convicted Accused in Murder Case — Age Determination Issue Not Proven. Appellant failed to establish juvenility on date of offence despite claiming birth date of 6/7/1983, as evidence from school and birth records was inconsistent.

The appellant, Amit @ Bapu Nanasaheb Bhandwalkar, was convicted in a criminal case and filed Criminal Appeal No. 38 of 2005 before the Bombay High Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Court upholds validity of motion passed by majority under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act.

The petitioners, who were members of the Gram Panchayat of Moghamwadi, filed a writ petition challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the S...