Search Results for "Maharashtra 2015 Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Maharashtra 2015 Act"

7172 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7172 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Multinational Company in Rent Control Case. Section 3(1)(b) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 exempts premises let to multinational companies from protection of the Act, and concurrent findings of fact are not interfered with under Section 115 CPC.

10 Jul 2015

The applicant, Eloff Hansson (India) Pvt. Ltd., was a tenant in office premises in Mumbai. The respondents, landlords, terminated the tenancy in 1993 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Guarantors in SFC Act Recovery Case — Directors Held Jointly and Severally Liable for Company Loan. Guarantors Cannot Raise Defences of Principal Debtor Under Section 31(1)(aa) of State Financial Corporation Act, 1951.

26 Feb 2019

The appeal arises from a judgment dated 19th September 2007 passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge, Pune, in Miscellaneous Civil Petition No.859 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Writ Petitions Challenging EPF Assessment on Municipal Councils as Principal Employers. Statutory Liability Under Employees’ Provident Funds Act for Contractor Workers Subject to Natural Justice and Exemption Under Section 16(1)(c).

27 Feb 2024

The writ petitions were filed by various municipal councils and corporations in Maharashtra challenging orders passed by the Assistant Provident Fund ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Application in MSMED Act Arbitration. Court Holds That Section 34 Application Is Maintainable and Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) Applies.

20 Jul 2016

The appellant, M/s. Ravindranath GE Medicate Associate Private Limited, issued a work order dated 9th January 2008 to the respondent, M/s. Clean Coats...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Validity of Sanction for Prosecution in Discharge Petitions Filed by Accused Including a Cabinet Minister Under the Income Tax Act. Principal Question Examined: Whether the Principal Director of Income Tax is Competent to Grant Sanction Under Section 279 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

12 Nov 2019

The matter pertained to three criminal revision petitions filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by ac...

High Court

High Court considers challenge to Indian Nursing Council's authority to recognise nursing institutions under Indian Nursing Council Act, 1947. Petitions filed questioning INC's power to publish list of recognised institutions and state reliance on INC approval for scholarships and admissions.

9 Oct 2017

The matter involved two writ petitions filed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The first petition, Writ Petition No. 11260 of 2017...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Land Owner's Consent Essential for Mode of Acquisition Under Section 126(1) MRTP Act — TDR Grant Requires Agreement, Not Unilateral Authority Action. The Court ruled that the option between monetary compensation and TDR under Section 126(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 is not solely with the acquiring authority but requires the consent of the land owner.

25 Jul 2022

This judgment arises from a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur, which disagreed with the view taken in Asha Sunil Z...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition for Statue Beautification Due to Non-Compliance with RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Acquisition Initiated Without Following Mandatory Preliminary Steps Under Sections 4 and 11 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Violating Article 300A of the Constitution.

13 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Dr. Chandrashekhar Gattani, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of his land bearing Nazul Plot No. 41/1, admeasuring 660...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Sealing of Sonography Machine Under PCPNDT Act — Failure to Maintain Records Not Sufficient Ground for Sealing Without Evidence of Offence. The court held that sealing requires satisfaction that the machine would furnish evidence of an offence, not mere procedural lapses.

12 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Janaki Ultra Sound Center, through its authorized handler Dr. Deelip Madhukarrao Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the order of...

High Court

SPECIAL CASE NO. 3 OF 2001

6 Jan 2015

The Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992, presided over by Justice Roshan Dalvi, heard Special Case No. ...

60 61 62 63 64

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)