Search Results for "Development Control Regulation"

1595 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1595 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Land Acquisition for Private Companies Due to Lack of Public Purpose and Favoritism. State's Exercise of Eminent Domain Found to be Misused for Allocating Valuable Land to Private Entities Without Legitimate Industrial Development Goals.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a writ appeal challenging a single judge's order dated 06.03.2013 in W.P.No.17211/2009. The appeal was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Against Municipal Corporation for Issuance of TDR Certificates. Transfer of Development Rights must be granted in accordance with Development Control Regulations and cannot be arbitrarily denied.

The petitioners in these four writ petitions are owners of lands that were acquired by the Amravati Municipal Corporation for the construction of a ro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against High Court's Quashing of ICADR Arbitral Orders in Private Road Concession Dispute. Core issue involves whether arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and ICADR Rules can be overridden by the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983.

The Supreme Court heard a civil appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition No. 13415 of 2025, challenging the High Court of Madhya Pradesh's judgmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator by Developer. Appointment of Arbitrator Without Mutual Consent Held Invalid Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, a proposed cooperative housing society and its members, entered into a development agreement with the respondent, a developer, for re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Against Charity Commissioner's Sanction for Sale of Public Trust Property — Challenge Raised on Grounds of Lack of Public Auction and Violation of Natural Justice Under Section 36 of Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950.

The writ petitions challenged the Charity Commissioner's order dated 2/9/2011 granting sanction to the trustees of a public trust to sell trust proper...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Grant of Scheme to Another Developer. Court upholds SRA's decision based on eligibility criteria and policy, finding no arbitrariness or violation of principles of natural justice.

The Petitioners, Dyna Estate Pvt. Ltd. (a developer) and Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Nagar Sahakari Griha Nirman Sanstha (a proposed cooperative society of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Constitutional Challenge to COFEPOSA Preventive Detention Powers for Foreign Exchange Violations. Petitioners Contend Absence of Penal Provisions Under FEMA Renders Section 3(1) Unconstitutional.

The writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed directly in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3(1)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Property Tax Reassessment Under Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 — Held That Notice Under Section 116(2) Is Not a Condition Precedent for Reassessment Under Section 116(1).

The petitioners, owners of a property in Baramati, challenged the reassessment of property tax by the Baramati Nagar Parishad. The property was origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Against National Sports Club of India Construction, Upholding Environmental and Municipal Permissions. Court finds no violation of CRZ or heritage regulations and rejects allegations of illegal construction as motivated by private interests.

The petitioner, Society for Promotion of Equality, Awareness and Rights (SPEAR), filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court seeki...