Search Results for "wrong rule"

4998 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4998 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Reference to Arbitration Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Filing of Written Statement Does Not Waive Right to Seek Arbitration.

The petitioner, M/S Alang Metal Exim Pvt. Ltd., filed a money suit (O.S.No.3749/2013) against the respondents, MSTC Limited and The Fertilizers & Chem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010044762015_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka adjudicates criminal appeals arising from conviction of a bank employee and relative for conspiracy, forgery, and corruption. Convictions under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 were challenged before the High Court.

The appeals arose out of the judgment dated 26.12.2009 passed by the Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bangalore in Spl.C.C.No.29/2004, whereby the appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Issues Rule in PIL Challenging Encroachment and Regularisation of Comunidade Lands; Petitioners Allege Violation of Code of Comunidades and Favouritism to Minister.

Two Public Interest Litigation writ petitions (PIL WP No. 15 of 2014 and PIL WP No. 16 of 2014) were filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Peon's Claim for Promotion to Tracer Post, Upholds Direct Recruitment Requirement. Post of Tracer Must Be Filled by Direct Recruitment Under Rule 5(1)(e) of Orissa Subordinate Architectural Service Rules, 1979, Not by Promotion from Peon Cadre.

The petitioner, Jyostnamayee Mishra, was appointed as a peon in the Works Department of the State of Odisha in 1978. She sought promotion to the post ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Transfer of Writ Petitions and Contempt Petition from Aurangabad Bench to Principal Seat Under Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules, 1960. Legality of Chief Justice's Administrative Transfer Orders and Validity of Proviso to Rule 2 of Chapter XXXI Raised.

The Bombay High Court heard three writ petitions filed by the Lawyers' Forum for General Utility & Litigating Public, Aurangabad, challenging the admi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Professor's Petition, Quashes Recovery from Gratuity and Pension. Recovery of Rs.8,43,782/- from retiral benefits set aside as employer failed to prove misrepresentation or fraud by employee, and recovery from pension/gratuity is impermissible under settled law.

The petitioner, Ganesh Sitaram Magar, a retired Ayurved professor, challenged the recovery of Rs.8,43,782/- from his gratuity and pension benefits. He...