Search Results for "property fraud"

2276 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2276 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Recall Order in Execution Proceedings. Judgment Debtor's Application Under Section 151 CPC for Recalling Order Dated 10.07.2024 Was Rightly Dismissed as Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, M/s Pushpam Realty, a partnership firm, is the judgment debtor in Execution No.1075/2020 pending before the III Additional City Civil ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit for Clubbing Properties in Different Jurisdictions. Section 17 CPC Does Not Permit a Single Suit for Separate Immovable Properties Situated in Different States.

The appeal arose from a civil suit filed by the appellant (plaintiff) seeking declaration that two properties—one in Indore, Madhya Pradesh, and ano...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction Against Developer in Property Dispute Over Unregistered Agreement. Court Restrains Construction on Suit Properties Pending Suit, Holding That Unregistered Agreement of Sale Cannot Confer Title or Right to Develop.

The appellant, Lodha Estate Private Limited, challenged an order of injunction passed by the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 186/2011. The respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Testamentary Suit — Execution of Will Proved in Accordance with Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Propounder discharged burden of proving due execution and attestation of Will despite suspicious circumstances.

The appeal arose from a judgment and decree dated 30th June, 2016 passed by the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Testamentary Suit No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Film Promotion Case for Misuse of Police Commissioner's Name and Emblem. The court held that the advertisement was a promotional gimmick and did not constitute cheating, forgery, or any offence under the Information Technology Act.

The applicants, Sanjay Gupta (a film director and producer) and a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, were named as accused in FIR No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Partition Suit — Suit Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata. Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application Dismissed as Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Time-Barred.

The appellants, three sisters, filed a suit for partition and separate possession of the suit property claiming to be co-owners along with their broth...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Partition Suit — Limitation and Res Judicata Cannot Be Decided Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Without Trial

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs in the original suit, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)...