Search Results for "narrow interpretation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "narrow interpretation"

1050 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1050 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for PL Encashment Despite Dismissal — Penalty of Dismissal Does Not Forfeit Privilege Leave Encashment Unless Service Rules Expressly Provide. Leave encashment is a vested right and not forfeited by dismissal in the absence of express rule.

19 Feb 2025

The petitioner, G. Linganagouda, a former Assistant Manager of Pragathi Krishna Gramina Bank (now Karnataka Gramina Bank), was dismissed from service ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal in Arbitration Matter — Sets Aside Order Dismissing Section 34 Petition. Court holds that the Commercial Court erred in dismissing the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the award was patently illegal for ignoring contractual terms and failing to consider the appellant's counterclaim.

14 Mar 2025

The present appeal arises from a commercial dispute between M/s. Strategic Infra Services Pvt. Ltd. (appellant) and Mphasis Limited (respondent). The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Order on Permanency and Back Wages in Newspaper Industry Dispute. Industrial Court's finding that previous litigation had determined entitlement to permanency and back wages was upheld, but the High Court held that the Industrial Court had no jurisdiction to grant permanency under the MRTU Act.

12 Mar 2010

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by employees (Sanjay Shalikram Ingle and others) against M/s. Lokmat Newspapers Private Ltd., chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Gratuity Dispute — Holds That Dismissal for Disorderly Behaviour Under Model Standing Orders 22(a) and 22(l) Constitutes 'Disorderly Conduct' Under Section 4(6)(b)(i) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Disentitling Employee to Gratuity.

14 Feb 2011

The petitioner, Jaya Hind Industries Ltd., employed the respondent, Vilas Vithalrao Takale, as a Clerk. Two charge sheets were issued to the responden...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.5186 OF 2001

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stock Broking Dispute — Mitigation of Damages Upheld. Court holds that the arbitral tribunal's finding on failure to mitigate damages within a reasonable period is a finding of fact not amenable to interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

19 Jul 2013

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Learned Single Judge dated 17 April 2012 dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Admissions for Violation of RTE Act — Screening Test for Class V Admission Held Illegal Under Section 13(1) of Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. Pending Application for Specified Category Status Does Not Exempt School from Compliance.

19 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Jnana Prabodhini, a public charitable trust running a school, challenged an order dated 29 May 2013 passed by the Education Officer (S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Recovery of Contractual Dues from Private Company. Disputed Questions of Fact Regarding Outstanding Amount Under Housekeeping Contract Cannot Be Adjudicated Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

19 Sep 2006

The petitioners, Fancy Rehabilitation Trust and its Managing Trustee, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking rec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes ITAT Order Rejecting Rectification Application as Time-Barred — Limitation Runs from Receipt of Order Under Rule 34A of ITAT Rules, 1963. The Court held that the six-month period under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for filing a rectification application runs from the date of receipt of the order, not the date of the order, because the applicant must file a certified copy of the order under Rule 34A read with Rule 9 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963.

1 Dec 2025

The Petitioner, Accost Media LLP, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 13 October 2025 passed by the Income T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Bank Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding — Enquiry Found Fair and Findings Not Perverse. Part-I Award of Industrial Tribunal Confirmed as No Violation of Natural Justice or Principles of Evidence.

23 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Chandrakant Shinde, an employee of Maharashtra Gramin Bank (a Regional Rural Bank established under the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976...

59 60 61 62 63

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)