Search Results for "judicial inquiry"

4010 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4010 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Applications to Appoint Arbitrator in LLP and Trust Dispute Over School Management Agreements. Court Holds That Arbitration Clause in School Management Services Agreement Binds Non-Signatory Trust Due to Interconnected Agreements.

The judgment concerns two arbitration applications filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Edufocus International Edu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Suspension Orders of Municipal Officers Under Section 56(1)(b) of BPMC Act for Disciplinary Enquiry. The court overruled a previous Division Bench decision that had restricted the provision to criminal proceedings, holding that suspension pending enquiry into charges is valid.

The case involved a writ petition filed by five officers of the Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation challenging their suspension orders. The petitioners...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process in Criminal Complaint for Non-Compliance with Section 202 Cr.P.C. — Accused Residing Beyond Jurisdiction Requires Inquiry Before Issuance of Process

The petitioner, Motilal Khivraj Banthia, was an accused in RTC No.254 of 2010 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kopargaon, District ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Initiate Criminal Complaint for Alleged Offences Under IPC. Court holds that mere filing of civil suit and criminal complaint does not warrant initiation of proceedings under Section 340 CrPC without prima facie satisfaction of offence.

The appellant, Arun Kumar Sharma, filed a criminal appeal under Section 341 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment and orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MSRTC's 'Kutumb Suraksha Yojna' Scheme for Re-appointing Terminated/Suspended Conductors as Arbitrary and Unconstitutional. Scheme Allowing Re-appointment of Conductors Charged with Misappropriation of Funds Violates Public Interest and Article 14 of the Constitution.

The Bombay High Court, in a suo motu public interest litigation, examined the validity of the 'Kutumb Suraksha Yojna' scheme introduced by the Maharas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Detention Under MPDA Act — Preventive Detention Upheld as Legally Valid. Court holds that subjective satisfaction of detaining authority based on credible material is sufficient and not vitiated by delay in disposal of representation.

The case involves a criminal writ petition filed by 23 petitioners challenging their detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activitie...