Search Results for "cognizance versus charge"

1078 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1078 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows State Appeal in SC/ST Act Case — Investigation by Officer Below DSP Rank Invalid for Atrocities Offence but Not for IPC Offences. Trial for IPC Offences Restored Despite Defective Investigation Under Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act.

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court which confirmed the trial court's order discharging Babbu R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Cancellation of Flat Allotment for Non-Payment Due to Non-Issuance of Demand Letter. Petitioner's Allotment Cannot Be Cancelled Without Issuance of Formal Demand Letter Under Regulation 18(1) of MHADA (Disposal of Land) Regulations, 1992.

The petitioner, Sandeep Uttam Bodke, applied for allotment of a flat under the Lower Income Group (LIG) category in response to an advertisement issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Anticipatory Bail Application in POCSO and Atrocities Act Case - Section 42-A POCSO Act Prevails Over Section 14-A Atrocities Act, Making Section 438 CrPC Maintainable.

The case involved an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC by Aniket Labade, accused of offences under IPC, POCSO Act, and SC/ST Act. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Secretary in Forgery Case Involving Forged Signatures on Society Documents. Concurrent findings of fact based on expert evidence and witness testimony not interfered with in revision.

The applicant, Pundlik Vishvanath Bangadkar, was the Secretary of Ganesh Shikshan Sanstha, Bhendra. The complainant, Anandrao Wanjari, was the Preside...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Convicts Directors for Default in Filing Statement of Affairs Under Section 454(5) of Companies Act, 1956 — Failure to Submit Statement Despite Repeated Court Orders and Notices Constitutes Offence Without Reasonable Excuse.

The Official Liquidator of M/s. Geeta Marine Services Pvt. Ltd. filed a complaint under Section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 1956 against four accused...