Search Results for "Rule Returnable"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Rule Returnable"

8708 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8708 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Claim in Service Law Dispute — Suspension Period Counted as Qualifying Service Under CCS Pension Rules. Rule 23 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 read with Office Memorandum dated 28.02.1976 mandates that suspension period not expressly excluded by order must be treated as qualifying service.

7 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Sahadev Rama Gadling, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the denial of pension by the re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Employee for Habitual Absence — Labour Court and Industrial Court Findings Not Perverse. Disciplinary Authority's Decision Based on Evidence of Misconduct Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1979.

10 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Arjun Kashinath Badade, was employed as a Chowkidar with the Water and Land Management Institute (WALMI) since 1984 and was granted pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Oral Evidence in Temporary Injunction Proceedings Under Order 39 Rule 1 CPC. The Court has inherent jurisdiction to permit oral evidence for just and effective adjudication of interim injunction applications.

27 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Babulal Onkardas Kabra, was the original defendant in a suit filed by the respondents, Nilesh, Shailesh, and Rakesh Pukhraj Rathod, in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Bunching Benefit Under Revised Pay Rules 2008 — Rule 7(1)(A)(ii) Proviso Applied to Fix Pay of Employee Promoted Before 2006. The court held that the proviso to Rule 7(1)(A)(ii) of CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 applies where two employees drawing same pre-revised pay are promoted to same post, and fitment table results in different revised pay stages.

11 Jul 2023

The petitioner, Jayashree Anil Satheye, was employed as a Junior Hindi Translator at Currency Note Press, Nashik, appointed on July 17, 1984. She was ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order to Try Jurisdiction as Preliminary Issue in Contract Dispute. Exclusive jurisdiction clause in contract designating Mumbai courts does not automatically oust territorial jurisdiction of Aurangabad court without proper adjudication.

13 Dec 2022

The petitioner, M/s Ghai Construction, filed a suit (Spl. C. S. No. 276 of 2009) in the Civil Court at Aurangabad for recovery of Rs. 652.06 Lakhs fro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Convict's Petition for Emergency Parole Amid COVID-19 Pandemic. Convict with Heart Condition Entitled to Emergency Parole Under Rule 19(1)(C)(ii) of Maharashtra Prisons (Mumbai Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 as He Surrendered on Time on Previous Occasions.

10 Jul 2020

The petitioner, Gajanan S/o Babulal Battulwar, a convict serving life imprisonment for an offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, filed a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appellate Order Setting Aside Dismissal of Suit Under Order IX Rule 5 CPC — Order IX Rule 5 CPC Held Directory, Not Mandatory, and Dismissal of Suit for Non-Service of Summons Within One Year Not Automatic Where Suit Has Progressed to Evidence Stage

17 Sep 2010

The case involves a writ petition filed by Smt. Zaibunnisa and Mr. Riyazur Rahim, sister and brother, against an order passed by the 6th Additional Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Eating House Licence for Lack of Personal Liability — Licencee Not Vicariously Liable for Acts of Employees Without Prior Knowledge or Consent Under Bombay Police Act, 1951. The court held that the licencee cannot be held vicariously liable for the acts of his employees unless it is shown that the acts were done with his knowledge or consent or that he failed to exercise due diligence.

16 Nov 2011

The petitioner, Shri Appu M. Shetty, aged 70 years, is the proprietor of Hotel Sona, an eating house with a permit room located in Goregaon, Mumbai. H...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Court Upholds Award of Mesne Profits and Rejection of Set-Off Claim Under Specific Relief Act and Partnership Act

22 Oct 2013

The case involves three writ petitions filed by M/s Resources International, Mr. Dipak M. Rajani, Mrs. Meena D. Rajani, and M/s Resourceful Earthmover...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Return of Security Deposit in Tender Dispute - Bank Cannot Forfeit Deposit Without Express Contractual Term. Petitioner withdrew offer before acceptance; no concluded contract; Bank directed to refund Rs.25,00,000/- with interest.

26 Apr 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Bholenath Trading Company, a partnership firm, submitted a tender in response to a tender notice dated 9.10.2004 issued by the re...

59 60 61 62 63

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)