Search Results for "Partnership dispute"

1947 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1947 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in MOFA Case Due to Binding Consent Decrees — Competent Authority Cannot Override Civil Court Decrees. Consent Decree Operates as Res Judicata and Estoppel Between Parties Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

The Petitioner, owner of a larger property, had constructed a building and sold flats to purchasers who formed Respondent No. 2 Society. The Petitione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty on Development Agreement Under Section 47(c)(5) of Maharashtra Stamp Act — Purpose of Instrument Failed. Development Agreement is an instrument covered under Section 47(c)(5) for refund when the purpose fails, and Section 48 is only a limitation provision.

The petitioner, M/s. Chandiwala Enterprises, a registered partnership firm, entered into a Development Agreement with Neel Ashiward CHS Ltd. on 2nd Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in MOFA Dispute — Petitioner's Rights as Agreement Holder Ignored. Unilateral Conveyance Granted Without Notice to Petitioner Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

The Petitioner, Gayatri Construction, a partnership firm, challenged an order dated 15 November 2022 and corrigendum dated 20 December 2022 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Real Estate Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Agreement to Sell and Possession. Appellant failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform contract under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Mohammed Zain Khan, filed a Second Appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Abetment of Suicide Charges Against Two Applicants in Absence of Direct Instigation. Suicide Note Mentioned Mental Harassment and Corona Pandemic as Reasons, But No Proximate Link Established Between Applicants' Conduct and Suicide.

The judgment concerns two criminal applications filed by Yogesh Rupchandji Agrawal and Sushil Jaydeo Dandale seeking quashing of FIR No. 803/2021 regi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Contract Dispute Between Partnership Firm and Municipal Council — Interest Rate of 9% Upheld. Claim for 18% Interest Not Supported by Contract or Evidence Under Section 34 CPC.

The appellant, a partnership firm, filed a suit against the Faizpur Municipal Council for recovery of amounts due under a construction contract. The t...