KAHC010218752018_1
20 Sep 2021...
Search Results for "Delayed Payment Charges"
666 result(s) found
Found 666 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Second Appeal in Execution Dispute Over Attached Property — Sale Agreement Prior to Attachment Confers Right to Resist Execution Under Order XXI Rules 58 and 97 CPC. The Court held that attachment before judgment does not create any right or title, and a prior sale agreement coupled with possession gives the purchaser a right to object to execution.
13 Apr 2015The appellant, S.K. Gangadhara, entered into a registered sale agreement on 01.07.2004 for the purchase of a house property from Sri B.M. Krishna. The...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused No.12 in Double Murder Case Due to Prolonged Incarceration and Delayed Trial. The court held that the applicant's role was peripheral and that continued detention without imminent trial conclusion would violate the right to speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution.
25 Sep 2024The applicant, Vipul Amrutlal Patel, accused No.12, sought bail in connection with C.R.No.39 of 2018 registered with Nani Daman police station, arisin...
- 758
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Class Action by Homebuyers Under Section 35(1)(c) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Builder's Objection on Miniscule Percentage Rejected. Commonality of Interest Found in Delay in Possession and Unfair Trade Practices, Allowing Representative Complaint for All 1134 Apartment Purchasers.
17 Dec 2021The case involves an appeal by Brigade Enterprises Limited, a builder, against an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC)...
- 491
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Parents of Deceased MBA Student, Enhances Compensation from Rs. 2 Lakh to Rs. 23.38 Lakh in Motor Accident Claim. Notional Income of Rs. 15,000 Per Month Adopted with 40% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 18.
18 Aug 2023The appellants, parents of the deceased Sujeet Singh, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation of...
- 84
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Reassessment Case — Tribunal's Finding of Full Disclosure Upheld. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as Assessee Disclosed All Material Facts in Return.
29 Jul 2022The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-28 under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Incom...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favour of Contractor in Postal Department Contract Dispute — Claims for Idle Labour, Machinery, and Loss of Profit Held Not Supported by Evidence and Contrary to Contract Terms. The court held that an arbitrator cannot award damages for idle resources or loss of profit without proof of deployment or anticipated profits, and such awards are perverse and patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
13 Feb 2020The Petitioner, Union of India through the Postal Department, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challen...
- 102
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stockbroker Dispute, Upholds Limitation and Maintainability. The Court held that the claim was within limitation due to acknowledgement of debt and that the arbitration application was maintainable despite directors' disqualification.
9 Jul 2019The Appellant, Kaynet Finance Limited, a member-broker at the National Stock Exchange of India, was appointed by the Respondent, Verona Capital Limite...
- 216
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Voluntary Accompaniment. Prosecutrix's Voluntary Conduct and Delayed FIR Undermine Allegations Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC.
19 Aug 2006The appellant, Rajan Kannan Padiyachi, was convicted by the 1st Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, in Sessions Case No.159 of 1997 for offences...
- 124
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute — Contractual Breach Without Deception Does Not Attract Section 420 IPC.
25 Aug 2016The petitioner, Sussanne Khan, a sole proprietor of a design firm, was engaged by the respondent no. 3, Mudhit Gupta, under a written contract to prov...
- 112
