Search Results for "Article 225"

730 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 730 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Popat @ Bhujangrao Bhausaheb Mahurkar, Sou. Vandana Popat Mahurkar, and Kum. Meena Bhausaheb Mahurkar, were convicted by the V Ad-hoc ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Inordinate Delay. The court held that the detaining authority failed to apply its mind and the delay of over two years in executing the order vitiated the detention.

The petitioner, Naresh Dua, brother of the detenu Rajesh Dua, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution. Delay of 14 Months in Serving Detention Order Renders Subjective Satisfaction Stale and Detention Invalid Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, father of the detenu, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a detention order dated 2/8/2008...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Order Deleting Defendant Without Deciding Arbitration Application. Trial Court Cannot Delete Party Without Adjudicating Application Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. GTS Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 14.10.2008 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to SRA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. CEO's Direction to Process Letter of Intent Upheld as 70% Consent of Eligible Members Was Validly Obtained Under DCR 33(10).

The case involves a slum rehabilitation scheme under DCR 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai. The petitioners, Lokhandwal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Counterfeiting Currency Notes but Acquits Some Accused of Criminal Conspiracy. Court holds that possession and use of counterfeit currency notes without proof of conspiracy does not attract Section 120B IPC.

The case involves two appeals arising from Sessions Case No.126/2006 decided by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar. The first appeal was filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder of Wife Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Appellant's Conviction Under Section 302 IPC for Murder of His Wife Confirmed as Circumstantial Evidence, Including Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Weapon, Established Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rajendra Pandurang Sonwane, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the murder of his wife, Sumanbai, and se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Implementation. Court upholds eligibility determination and authorization of developer under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash proceedings leading to implementation of a Slum ...