Search Results for "substantial breach"

2167 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2167 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Beneficiaries in Trust Petition — Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Applies. Court holds that persons claiming beneficial interest under a trust are necessary and proper parties to a trust petition under Section 41A of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the petitioner, Harishchandra Amarnath Puri, in a Trust Petition (No. 1 of 2017) pending before the Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash Criminal Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case — Directors of Company Not Entitled to Quashing Under Section 482 CrPC When Trial Already Commenced and No Exceptional Circumstances Shown.

The petitioners, Mrs. Shama G. Bothe and Mr. Guido Bothe, directors of Chinkara Motors Private Limited (CMPL), filed a criminal writ petition under Ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Breach of Marriage Contract Case — Contract Not Void Ab Initio Despite Minority of Bride. Damages Recoverable Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 for Money Spent on Betrothal Ceremony.

The plaintiffs, Tulshiram and his daughter Rekha, filed a suit for damages against the defendants, Roopchand and his father Laxman, for breach of a co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revocation of Leave Under Clause 12 Letters Patent and Allows Amendment to Plaint on Jurisdiction. Court holds that jurisdiction is determined by plaint averments as a whole and subsequent amendment cannot cure lack of jurisdiction at the time of filing.

The plaintiff, Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Limited, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court for recovery of Rs. 3,72,87,086/- with inter...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Petition Challenging Stop Work Notice in Slum Redevelopment Project. Corporation's Notice Under Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Quashed for Non-Compliance with DCR 33(7) Prior Approval Requirement.

The petitioner, M/s Crescent Property Developers, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Stay in No Confidence Motion Case — No Fresh Motion Barred Under Section 35(3-A) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 as First Motion Was Not Moved or Carried.

The appellant, Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale, was elected Sarpanch of Theur village panchayat in 2010. On 5 October 2011, a no confidence motion was init...