High Court of Bombay at Nagpur hears writ petitions by several individuals against Nagpur Municipal Corporation regarding undisclosed matter.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "market value compensation"
1485 result(s) found
Found 1485 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Land Acquisition Reference for Jogeshwari-Vikhroli Link Road. Market Value Fixed at Rs. 100 per sq.mt Based on Expert Valuation and Comparable Sales Under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
3 May 2005The Special Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO) filed a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, seeking the court's determination on...
- 103
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals of Landowners in KIADB Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhancement Denied as Landowners Failed to Prove Higher Market Value. Landowners sought enhanced compensation for acquired lands but did not produce evidence of higher market value; court upheld Single Judge's dismissal.
29 Apr 2016The case pertains to 16 landowners (appellants) whose lands were acquired by the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB) for industrial de...
- 62
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Approval of APMC Bye-Law Amendment Allowing Private Markets in Agricultural Produce Marketing. Amendment to Bye-Law 44(1) of the Tiptur APMC enabling private market yards held valid under Section 63 of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966.
19 Jul 2018The petitioners, eleven agriculturists from Tiptur Taluk, Tumkur District, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Rate to Rs.306 per sqm Based on Comparable Sale Deeds. Court Relies on Sale Deed of Adjacent Land to Determine Market Value Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
11 Mar 2014The case arises from a land acquisition proceeding initiated by the Government of Goa for public purposes. The Deputy Collector (Dev) & Land Acquisiti...
- 109
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Land Compensation Enhancement in Acquisition for Rehabilitation. Market value fixed at Rs. 67,500 per hectare based on sale instances and land suitability under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
26 Nov 2012The case involves two appeals arising from a judgment and award dated 30.11.1996 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Amravati in L.A.C. No.92/...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Under Section 23(1-A) and Interest Cannot Be Awarded from Date Prior to Section 4 Notification. The court held that additional compensation under Section 23(1-A) and interest on solatium must be calculated from the date of Section 4 notification, not from the date of prior possession.
3 Sep 2013The case arises from a land acquisition proceeding under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (the Act). The appellants, the Deputy Collector (L.A.)/MPT and...
- 121
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquisition for Konkan Railway — Market Value Determined Based on Comparable Sale Deeds and Potential for Development. The court affirmed the Reference Court's award of Rs.30/- per sq. metre for developed land acquired under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, rejecting the acquiring body's appeal.
11 Feb 2005The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Chief Engineer of Konkan Railway Corporation Limited against the ...
- 157
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Solatium and Additional Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Referral Court Failed to Grant Mandatory Benefits Under Sections 23(1-A), 23(2) and 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Claimants Entitled to 30% Solatium, 12% Additional Compensation from Notification to Award, and Interest on Enhanced Compensation.
14 Oct 2022The present appeal was filed by the appellants, who were the original claimants in a land acquisition matter, against the judgment of the Referral Cou...
- 21
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be in Conflict with Public Policy or Suffering from Patent Illegality. The court held that the arbitrator's interpretation of the contract and byelaws was plausible and not perverse, and the award did not warrant interference.
11 Mar 2010The petitioner, Rajendra Kumar Bothra, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award d...
- 55
