Search Results for "interest refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "interest refund"

2420 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2420 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance of Granted Land Subject to Non-Alienation Condition. Court Examines Whether Agreement to Sell Executed During Non-Alienation Period is Void Under Karnataka SC/ST Act, 1978.

22 Jan 2026

The civil revision petition arose from an order of the trial court rejecting the petitioners' application to reject the plaint in a suit for specific ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against TDS Demand on Arbitral Award Deposits — Income Tax Officer Cannot Treat Court-Ordered Deposits as Income Until Final Determination of Rights. The court held that amounts deposited in court pursuant to a conditional stay order and withdrawn against a bank guarantee are not 'income' liable to Tax Deduction at Source under Section 194A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

21 Feb 2013

The petitioner, DSL Enterprises Private Limited, is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, as a successor in interest of Datar Switchge...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Part in Flat Purchase Dispute — Earnest Money Refund with Daily Fine and Compound Interest Upheld but Reduced. Clause 4 of Agreement for Construction and Sale Held to Be a Valid Forfeiture Clause, Not a Penalty, Under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

9 Mar 2005

The plaintiff, Dr. Jagdish J.N. Counte, entered into a written agreement dated 13.4.96 with the defendant, M/s. Carl Estate Private Limited, for the p...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.

18 Jan 2022

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Restitution to Judgment Debtor in Execution Case Despite Decree Modified Only as to Interest. Decree Holder Auction Purchaser Not Entitled to Protection Under Section 144 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

5 Jun 2017

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for recovery of money. The original plaintiffs (Respondent Nos. 1-3) filed Special Civil Suit No...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court of India Hears Appeals Against Bombay High Court Judgment Concerning Auction Sale Validity Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Key Issue: Whether Violation of Rule 107(11)(h) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 Renders Sale Void Despite Creditor's Waiver, to be Decided.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arises from recovery proceedings initiated by Mahanagar Co-operative Bank against a partnership firm, M/s. Borse Brothers, for defaulting ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Interest Demand on CLIII License Renewal Fee. Excise Department Cannot Levy Interest Without Specific Statutory Provision Under Maharashtra Excise Act, 2002 or Bombay Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953.

21 Nov 2017

The petitioners, Maheshprasad Dwarkadas Jaiswal and Rajeshwar Dwarkadas Jaiswal, are CLIII license holders for a liquor shop at Shahabazar, Aurangabad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares Payments Made by Company in Liquidation Void Under Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 and Orders Refund. Payments made after winding up order to caterer without court approval are void, and the caterer must repay with interest.

14 Jan 2020

The Official Liquidator of M/s. GOL Offshore Limited (in liquidation) filed OLR No. 139 of 2018 under Section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Central Excise Interest Liability Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Interest on differential duty under Section 11AB of Central Excise Act, 1944 is payable when price variation clause exists and duty is paid after price revision.

14 Jun 2013

The case involves an appeal by Gammon India Ltd. (formerly Associated Transrail Structures Ltd.) against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Insolvent's Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Adjudication Order in Insolvency Proceedings — Delay of 22 Days Condoned. The court held that the Insolvent had sufficient cause for non-appearance and that the ex-parte order was passed without proper service of notice.

5 Jun 2023

The case involves an application by the Insolvent, Parmanand Sitlaprasad Pandey, seeking to set aside an ex-parte adjudication order passed in insolve...

58 59 60 61 62

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)