Search Results for "hearing"

2038 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2038 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Refund Rejection Orders Quashed Due to Breach of Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017 and Violation of Natural Justice. Rejection of refund applications overturned on grounds of non-compliance with procedural rules and denial of opportunity for hearing.

The Petitioner challenged the rejection of its refund application by the department on the grounds of procedural irregularities and a breach of the Ce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Partition Suit Remanded for Inclusion of Joint Family Properties in Fresh Decision" "Appellate Court remands partition suit back to trial court for inclusion of all ancestral properties, ensuring equitable division among coparceners."

1. Appeal Background:The appellant, defendant No. 2 in Civil Suit No. 110 of 2012, has appealed the First Appellate Court’s decision to remand the p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Refund Denial Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017. Court orders reconsideration of refund applications by following procedural compliance under Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules.

The Court dealt with a petition challenging the rejection of a refund claim under CGST Rules, 2017. The petitioner argued that there was non-complianc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Petition Dismissed as Finance (No.2) Act of 2024 Resolves Main Issue. Petitioner Directed to Appeal; Appellate Authority to Consider Appeal on Merits in Light of 2024 Amendment.

The petition challenging the transition credit issue under Section 140(7) of the CGST Act, 2017, was rendered unnecessary due to the retrospective ame...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India Sets Aside High Court Judgment on Land Acquisition by Haryana Urban Development Authority. Legal validity upheld in land acquisition for public purposes, emphasizing procedural compliance under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The Supreme Court overturned the High Court decision quashing the land acquisition notifications by the Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA). Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court: Employee not a “Workman” under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act In a crucial judgment, the Supreme Court overturns reinstatement of an employee, ruling that supervisory duties and salary bar his classification as a "workman."

The Supreme Court of India dealt with the issue of whether the appellant, Lenin Kumar Ray, qualifies as a "workman" under Section 2(s) of the Industr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Arbitrary Remission Conditions for Life Sentence Convict "Conditions on remission must meet constitutional standards of reasonableness and fairness."

This appeal concerns the legality of conditions imposed while granting remission to the appellant, who was serving life imprisonment for offenses unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes VAT Assessment Order on Ferrero India Over Procedural Lapses and Legal Malafides Violation of Natural Justice and Statutory Limitations Results in VAT Demand Cancellation

The petitioners challenged assessment orders issued under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax (MVAT) Act. The orders sought to levy VAT on royalty payment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Challenge Against Lokayukta’s Direction on Payment Dispute Quashed by Court. Lokayukta’s jurisdiction and natural justice questioned; Cooperative Society's resolution challenged; Civil courts left to decide inheritance rights.

The petition challenged the Lokayukta’s order dated 6 December 2019, directing the cooperative society (Respondent No.2) to withhold payments for su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Case of Alleged Rape and False Promise of Marriage, Emphasizes Consensual Relationship. Supreme Court reiterates the distinction between consensual relationships and false promises to marry under Section 376 of IPC.

The Supreme Court, in this appeal, quashed the FIR filed under Section 376 IPC, citing the consensual nature of the relationship between the complaina...