Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petition in GST Transition Credit Matter, Directs Appeal to Be Considered on Merits. Amendment to Section 140(7) of CGST Act by Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 with retrospective effect addresses the main issue, relegating petitioner to appellate remedy.

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 311
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s. Lekar Pharma Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an Order-in-Original dated 27 February 2023 passed by the Joint Commissioner Central GST & C.Ex. The main issue raised in the petition pertained to transition credit under Section 140(7) of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017. During the pendency of the petition, the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 was enacted, which amended Section 140(7) with retrospective effect, thereby addressing the core issue. The court noted that the impugned order was appealable, but no appeal was filed possibly due to the transition credit issue. Since that issue now stood resolved by the retrospective amendment, the court found no reason to entertain the writ petition and relegated the petitioner to the appellate remedy. The court directed that if the petitioner files an appeal within four weeks from the date of the order, the Appellate Authority shall consider it on merits without going into the question of limitation, as the petitioner was bona fide prosecuting the writ petition since 23 June 2023. The Appellate Authority was also directed to take into consideration the effect of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 while deciding the appeal. All contentions of all parties were left open. The petition was disposed of without any order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Goods and Services Tax - Transition Credit - Section 140(7) of CGST Act, 2017 - Retrospective Amendment - The main issue regarding transition credit under Section 140(7) was addressed by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 which amended the provision with retrospective effect. Consequently, the court held that the petitioner should be relegated to the remedy of appeal against the impugned Order-in-Original dated 27 February 2023. (Paras 2-4)

B) Appellate Remedy - Limitation - Condonation of Delay - The court directed that if the petitioner files an appeal within four weeks, the Appellate Authority shall consider it on merits without raising the issue of limitation, as the petition was pending since 23 June 2023 and the petitioner was bona fide prosecuting it. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the writ petition challenging the Order-in-Original dated 27 February 2023 under the CGST Act should be entertained or the petitioner should be relegated to the appellate remedy in light of the retrospective amendment to Section 140(7) by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is disposed of. The petitioner is relegated to the remedy of appeal. If the petitioner files an appeal within four weeks from today, the Appellate Authority shall consider it on merits without going into the issue of limitation. The Appellate Authority shall take into consideration the effect of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 while deciding the appeal. All contentions of all parties are left open. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Retrospective amendment
  • Transition credit
  • Relegation to alternative remedy
  • Limitation condonation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (10) 226

WRIT PETITION NO.4330 OF 2024

2024-10-22

M. S. Sonak, Jitendra Jain

2024:BHC-OS:17644-DB

Adv. Jasmine Dixit i/b. UBR Legal Advocates for Petitioner; Mr. Y. R. Mishra a/w Mr. Siddharth Chandrashekhar for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 6; Ms. P. H. Kantharia, G. P. a/w Ms. Jyoti Chavan, Addl. G. P. for Respondent-State

M/s. Lekar Pharma Limited

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an Order-in-Original under the CGST Act.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to challenge the Order-in-Original dated 27 February 2023 and obtain relief regarding transition credit under Section 140(7) of the CGST Act.

Filing Reason

The petitioner challenged the Order-in-Original dated 27 February 2023 made by Joint Commissioner Central GST & C.Ex., possibly due to denial of transition credit under Section 140(7) of the CGST Act.

Previous Decisions

Order-in-Original dated 27 February 2023 was passed by Respondent No.4. No appeal was filed against it.

Issues

Whether the writ petition should be entertained or the petitioner should be relegated to the appellate remedy in light of the retrospective amendment to Section 140(7) of the CGST Act by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the main issue regarding transition credit under Section 140(7) was addressed by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024. Respondents agreed that the main issue stands addressed by the amendment.

Ratio Decidendi

When the main issue raised in a writ petition is addressed by a retrospective amendment to the relevant statute, the petitioner should be relegated to the alternative remedy of appeal, and the appellate authority should consider the appeal on merits without raising the issue of limitation if the petitioner was bona fide prosecuting the writ petition.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned counsel for the parties agree that the main issue raised in this petition stands addressed by the Finance (No.2) Act of 2024 by which Section 140(7) of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) was amended with retrospective effect. Now that this issue stands address by the Finance (No.2) Act of 2024, there is no reason why the Petitioner should not be relegated to the remedy of an appeal. Therefore, if the Petitioner files an appeal within four weeks from today, the Appellate Authority should consider such appeal on merits without going into the issue of limitation.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.4330 of 2024 on 23 June 2023 challenging the Order-in-Original dated 27 February 2023. The petition was heard on 22 October 2024 and disposed of with directions to file an appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017: Section 140(7)
  • Finance (No.2) Act, 2024:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay in Company Appeal as Court Lacks Power to Extend Limitation Beyond 60 Days Under Section 421 of Companies Act, 2013. Delay of 135 Days in Filing Appeal Against Company Law Board Order Cannot Be Condone...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Criminal Petition Against Orders Directing Regular Bail Despite Subsisting Anticipatory Bail. Held That Filing of Charge-Sheet Does Not Terminate Anticipatory Bail; Accused Need Not Apply for Regular Bail Unless Bail Or...