Bombay High Court Considers Application to Vacate Arrest Order of Vessel in Admiralty Suit. The Court Examines Alleged Suppression of Facts and Non-compliance with Caveat under Section 148A CPC.
26 Jul 2022Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...
Search Results for "grounds not pressed"
2049 result(s) found
Found 2049 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Rental Income Classification Case. Rental income from leasing unsold units of a commercial complex constructed by a real estate developer is assessable as business income, not income from house property.
9 Apr 2015The case involves multiple appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which ...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Appeals of Occupants Challenging Eviction from Comunidade Land — Appellants Failed to Prove Title or Authorisation, Eviction Upheld Under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC and Section 38 Specific Relief Act, 1963.
1 Nov 2023The case involves five first appeals filed by Ayub Khan, Khurshida Ahmad, Salim Sandhi, Mehmood A. Ansari, and Dadapir Lohar against the State of Goa,...
- 77
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Father's Appeal for Disinterment of Son's Body in Encounter Case, Upholding Right to Dignified Burial Under Article 21. The court held that the state's arbitrary denial of disinterment, while permitting it for others killed in the same encounter, violated Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, as the right to life includes the right of next of kin to perform last rites according to religious traditions.
12 Sep 2022The appeal arose from a dispute over the disinterment of the body of Mohd. Amir Magrey, killed in an encounter between police and militants in Hyderpo...
- 283
High Court
Bombay High Court Reviews Civil Revision Challenging Trial Court's Refusal to Reject Plaint in Partnership and Specific Relief Act Dispute. The Revision Application Asserts That Plaint Lacks Cause of Action and Is Barred by Section 34 of Specific Relief Act, 1963, Order 23 Rule 3A CPC, and Indian Partnership Act, 1932, But Final Outcome Is Not Stated in Available Excerpt.
13 Oct 2021The matter before the Bombay High Court arose from a Civil Revision Application filed by the defendants in Regular Civil Suit No. 11 of 2020 against a...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Eviction Petition in Rent Control Case — Tenant's Use of Residential Premises for Creche Constitutes Change of User and Nuisance. Running a creche in a residential tenancy amounts to change of user and nuisance, justifying eviction under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.
10 May 2013The original plaintiff, Smt. Sudha Sumant Barve (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), owned the ground and first floor of Shrikrupa Building i...
- 79
High Court
High Court Dismisses Petitions Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Arbitral Tribunal's Refusal of Interim Relief for Possession of Flats. Arbitral Tribunal's Discretion in Denying Interim Measures Under Section 17 Upheld, as No Patent Illegality or Perversity Demonstrated in Orders Dated February 14, 2019 and December 15, 2022.
5 Mar 2026The dispute originated from a Joint Development Agreement dated August 20, 2009, between the Owner (late Petitioners, represented by legal heirs) and ...
- 320
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Revision Against Tenant in Rent Control Eviction Suit — Notice of Demand Must Be Express Under Section 15(2) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Landlord's Failure to Demand Rent in Notice and Tenant's Regular Deposit of Rent in Court Precludes Eviction on Ground of Default.
21 Oct 2024The case involves a dispute between the original plaintiffs (landlords) and the defendant (tenant) over eviction from a shop premises. The landlords f...
- 573
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Air India Disinvestment and Transfer of Employees. Transfer of undertaking under Section 25FF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require consent of workmen and continuity of service is protected.
13 Mar 2023The petitioners, three trade unions representing employees of Air India and its subsidiaries, filed writ petitions challenging the disinvestment of Ai...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 376(b) and (c) CrPC in Cheque Dishonour Case — No Unconstitutionality Found. Petitioners convicted under Section 138 r/w 141 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 challenged the constitutional validity of provisions relating to appeal against acquittal, but court held them intra vires.
24 Jul 2013The petitioners, directors and a company, were convicted by the Metropolitan Magistrate on 26 July 2011 for offences under Section 138 read with Secti...
- 76
