APPEAL NO.662 OF 1995
16 Dec 2005The appeal arises from a judgment and order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 18 January 1996 in Arbitration Petition No.184 of...
Search Results for "government tender"
1914 result(s) found
Found 1914 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Contract by MMRDA. Contractual Dispute with Arbitration Clause Not Amenable to Judicial Review Under Article 226 as Termination Was in Accordance with Contract Terms.
25 Feb 2025The petitioner, Systra MVA Consulting (India) Pvt. Ltd., a company with 70% stake in Systra-SMCIPL Consortium, was appointed as General Consultant by ...
- 624
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Evacuee Property Dispute, Upholding Sale of Specified Area Under Displaced Persons Act. Property Transfer Limited to Area in Sale Certificate and Conveyance Deed, with Additional Areas Requiring Payment as per Chief Settlement Commissioner's Orders Under Section 24(1).
24 Jan 2024The appeal before the Supreme Court arose from a property dispute concerning 'Spring Field', an evacuee property in Shimla. The appellants, legal heir...
- 182
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application and Appoints Arbitrator in MCGM Contract Dispute. Court Holds That Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Within 30 Days of Notice Entities Applicant to Court-Appointed Arbitrator Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
10 Jan 2024The applicant, Kalpataru Projects International Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking app...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — No Conflict of Interest Found in Contract Awarded to Husband. Disqualification under Section 14(1)(g) read with Section 16 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 set aside as the contract was awarded before the petitioner became Sarpanch and there was no direct or indirect interest in the contract.
27 Jan 2022The petitioner, Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Malwada, was disqualified by the Collector Nanded under Section 14(1)(g) read with Section 16 of the Mah...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of BHEL Engineer Trainee for Demanding Illegal Gratification. Disciplinary proceedings validly conducted; no violation of natural justice or proportionality in penalty of removal for demanding bribe for placement of purchase order.
4 Feb 2021The petitioner, Umesh Eknath Agalawe, was employed as an Engineer Trainee with Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL). Disciplinary proceedings were ...
- 102
High Court
Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitrator Mandate Due to Expiry of Time Limit Under Arbitration Clause — Failure to Complete Arbitration Within Stipulated Period Results in Termination of Arbitrator's Authority. The court held that the mandate of the arbitrator stood terminated under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the arbitration was not completed within the time limit prescribed in clause 21 of the agreement.
1 Mar 2012The petitioner, Teltech Instrumentation Pvt. Ltd., filed an arbitration petition under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, se...
- 121
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Earnest Money by KSFC in E-Auction Under SARFAESI Act. Petitioner Claims Suppression of Pending Suit and Interim Order Affected Marketable Title, Rendering Auction Notification Fraudulent.
24 Sep 2019The petitioner, N. Lakshmana, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka seeking...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Reviews Consent Order in Commercial Execution Application Arising from Arbitration Award; State Challenges Consent Terms Signed During President's Rule Under Article 356 of the Constitution
5 Mar 2021The dispute arose from a contract awarded on 6 July 2012 by the State of Maharashtra through its Public Works Department to Manaj Tollway Private Limi...
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Corrigendum in Gram Panchayat Road Development Case — Violation of Natural Justice and Ultra Vires Government Resolution. The court held that the corrigendum dated 29.04.2020 modifying the Government Resolution dated 17.03.2020 for internal road development of 127 villages was issued without hearing the Gram Panchayats and is ultra vires.
28 Jan 2021The petitioners, four Gram Panchayats from Osmanabad District, challenged a corrigendum dated 29.04.2020 issued by the Secretary, Rural Development an...
- 27
