Search Results for "flat scheme"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "flat scheme"

1137 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1137 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Electricity Board Against MSEFC Awards Due to Limitation — Limitation Period Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Applies to MSMED Act Awards. Delay of 120 days cannot be condoned as per Section 34(3) proviso, and no sufficient cause was shown for the delay in filing the applications to set aside the awards.

27 Aug 2018

The case involves nine commercial appeals filed by various micro and small enterprises (appellants) against the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribu...

High Court

High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Hears Two Writ Petitions Regarding Regularisation of Gunthewari Layout Under Maharashtra Gunthewari Developments Act. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Order Dated 20.10.2005 Passed by Nagpur Improvement Trust.

5 May 2006

Two writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, challenging an order dated 20.10.2005 passed by the Chairman, Nagpur Impr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits to Retired Ayurvedic College Staff. Employees who took voluntary retirement are entitled to pension and gratuity under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, as the college is a government-aided institution.

19 Apr 2024

The petitioners, seven retired employees of Seth Govindji Raoji Ayurveda Mahavidyalaya (Respondent No. 4), an Ayurvedic college in Solapur, filed a wr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Company Seeking Dismissal of Complaint Filed by Employees Who Accepted Voluntary Retirement Scheme. Employees who accepted VRS benefits with a declaration waiving all claims cannot continue with a pending complaint under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

12 Jul 2005

The petitioner, M/s. Burroughs Wellcome (I) Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Industrial Court which dismissed its application ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Issues Ruling in Writ Petition No. 8428 of 2019 Regarding Property Dispute. The Petition Involves a Dispute Between Multiple Parties over Property Matters, Addressed Under the Writ Jurisdiction of the High Court.

7 May 2025

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Financier's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Hire-Purchase Repossession — Held That Financier Is Not a 'Service Provider' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for Repossession of Vehicle on Default. The court ruled that repossession of a vehicle under a hire-purchase agreement after default is a contractual right and not a deficiency in service.

1 Jan 2019

The appeal arose from a consumer dispute where the respondent, Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, had entered into a hire-purchase agreement with the appellant, M/s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Deemed Lapse of Land Reservation Under MRTP Act - Petitioners Entitled to Develop Land as Reservation Not Acquired Within Reasonable Time. The court held that the reservation of land for vegetable market and shopping centre and parking had lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, as the acquiring authority failed to acquire the land within a reasonable period.

23 Sep 2014

The petitioners, owners of a plot of land bearing Survey No.42/1+2/2/5 admeasuring 6796 sq. meters at Nashik, filed a writ petition under Article 226 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings in Complaint Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Due to Inordinate Delay and Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements. Magistrate's Order Without Application of Mind and 14-Year Delay in Investigation Constitute Abuse of Process, Proceedings Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

28 Feb 2017

The petitioners, Sayed Anwar Ahmed and Sayed Ghulam Raza Naqvi, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read wit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Regularization of Unauthorized Buildings in Navi Mumbai — Section 52A MRTP Act Does Not Apply to Lands Acquired for Public Purpose and Belonging to Planning Authority. The court held that the compounding provision under Section 52A of the MRTP Act, 1966 is not applicable to unauthorized constructions on lands acquired for public purpose and vested in the Planning Authority.

14 Aug 2018

The petitioners were residents of buildings constructed without development permission on lands acquired by the State Government for the satellite cit...

58 59 60 61 62

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)