Search Results for "arbitrators jurisdiction"

806 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 806 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Charter Hire Dispute. Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Does Not Provide for Appeal Against Interim Orders Under Section 17 of the Act.

The case involves an appeal filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction in Stock Broker Dispute. Seat of Arbitration Determined by NSEIL Byelaws, Not by Agreement Clause.

The petitioner, Kantilal Chhaganlal Securities Private Limited, a stock broker, challenged an arbitral award dated 29 April 2010 passed by a panel of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over CENVAT Credit Counter Claim — Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Limited to Disputes Arising from Contract Terms. Counter Claim for CENVAT Invoices Held Beyond Scope of Arbitration Agreement as No Demand Raised During Contract Period.

The dispute arose between Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) and Go Airlines (India) Limited under an Aviation Fuel Supply Agreement dated 01...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction Due to Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Lease Agreement. Parties Agreed That Chennai City Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Disputes, Despite Arbitration in Mumbai.

The petitioner, Vachaspati Sharma, challenged an arbitral award dated 16 June 2011 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, bef...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

APPEAL NO.662 OF 1995

The appeal arises from a judgment and order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 18 January 1996 in Arbitration Petition No.184 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Cross-Appeals Against Remand Order in Arbitration Matter — Power of Appellate Court Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Examined. The Court held that an appellate court under Section 37 cannot remand a Section 34 petition for fresh hearing but must decide the appeal on merits.

The dispute arose from a development agreement concerning a slum rehabilitation scheme in Mumbai. The appellant, Bombay Slum Redevelopment Corporation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Referral to Arbitration Despite Fraud Allegations in Development Agreement Dispute. Arbitration Clause Survives Challenge When Fraud Relates to Inducement Not Affecting Contractual Terms.

The appeal arose from a civil suit filed by Deccan Paper Mills Co. Ltd. (appellant) against Regency Mahavir Properties and others (respondents) seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute for Lack of Merit. Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenge fails as no patent illegality or perversity found in award rejecting damages for breach of contract.

The present petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 25th March 2021 pas...