Search Results for "Stay Pending Appeal"

3332 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3332 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Decides State's Appeal Against Acquittal for Offences Under IPC Sections 376(2)(f), 376(2)(k), 354, 354A, 354B, 341, 342. Case Involved Alleged Sexual Assault by Editor-in-Chief on Employee During THiNK Fest 2013.

The State of Goa filed an appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, the Editor-in-Chief of Tehelka magazine, who was charged with sexual assault...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears and Disposes of Challenge to Withdrawal of Lecturer Approval by Vice Chancellor. The Writ Petition Raises Key Questions on the Authority of University Officials Over Appointments in Affiliated Colleges.

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the withdrawal of approval of the petitioner's appointmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 When Possession Could Not Be Taken Due to Court Stay, and Stay Period Must Be Excluded from Five-Year Computation.

The dispute originated from land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The respondent landowner filed a writ petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Developer Not a 'Person Interested' Under Section 3(b) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as Its Interest Arose After Acquisition Through Agreement with Acquiring Authority.

The dispute arose from land acquisition by the Burdwan Development Authority (BDA) for a satellite township in Burdwan, West Bengal, under the Land Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Appeal in POCSO Act Case -- Appellant Convicted for Sexual Assault on Minor Under IPC Section 376(2)(f)(i) and POCSO Act Sections 5(i), 5(m), 5(p) -- Life Imprisonment and Fine Upheld Based on Victim's Credible Testimony and Medical Evidence

The High Court dismissed criminal appeal challenging conviction for sexual assault on minor -- Appellant was convicted by trial court under Section 37...