CONTEMPT PETITION NO.2 OF 2015
9 Feb 2016The petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a direction in an order dated 21.10.2013, passed in Company Application (L) ...
Search Results for "Commercial Division jurisdiction"
3090 result(s) found
Found 3090 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Parcel Space Lease Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that claimant failed to prove termination of contract and is not entitled to refund of security deposit.
31 Jul 2019The petitioner, Prajapati Gunwant Keshavlal, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral ...
- 115
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment for Debenture Trustee in Recovery Suit Against Corporate Guarantor. Defendant's Triable Issues Found to be Sham and Moonshine, Entitling Plaintiff to Judgment Under Order 37 CPC.
8 May 2015The plaintiff, IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd., filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendant, Hubtow...
- 102
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Enforce Foreign Arbitral Award Under Section 50(1)(b) of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Not Binding on Non-Signatory Respondents as They Were Not Parties to Arbitration Agreement.
4 Jan 2017The appellant, Integrated Sales Services Limited (ISSL), a Hong Kong company, entered into a Representation Agreement on 18th September 2000 with DMC ...
- 198
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Co-operative Housing Society from Appointing Another Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Letters exchanged between developer and society held to constitute a binding contract for redevelopment, and termination letter declared illegal.
1 Feb 2024The plaintiff, Pittie Antariksh Grl Pvt Ltd, a real estate company, filed a suit seeking declaration that letters dated 30/8/2021 and 23/10/2021 const...
- 108
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Conversion of Occupancy Class-II to Class-I Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 — Holds That Section 44 of the Code Does Not Bar Such Conversion for Lands Acquired Under Part VII of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
9 Jun 2022The petitioner, Ananta Landmarks Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order/communicat...
- 112
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Housing Society Against Developer Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act — Developer Restrained from Creating Third Party Rights and Directed to Remove Barricades. The court held that the society made out a strong prima facie case for interim measures pending arbitration due to the developer's failure to complete the project and the members' prolonged displacement.
7 Jul 2022The petitioner, Nehru Nagar Ratnadeep Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Prima Facie Case and Guilty of Iniquitous Conduct. The court upheld the Single Judge's refusal of interim injunction under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Copyright Act, 1957, finding suppression of facts and lack of evidence of ownership.
6 Apr 2026The present Commercial Appeal was filed by Laser Shaving India Pvt Ltd (the original plaintiff) against the order dated 25/06/2025 passed by the learn...
- 198
High Court
High Court of Bombay Allows Second Appeal in Interest Calculation Dispute — Appellant Entitled to Interest on Unpaid Rent from Date of Demand, Not Date of Suit. Court clarifies that under Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, interest for the period prior to suit can be granted at the contractual rate or under the Interest Act, 1978, and the court has discretion to award interest from the date of demand.
16 Oct 2018The appellant, Sahebrao Patil, filed a suit against the Municipal Council, Pachora, for recovery of unpaid rent and other amounts due under a lease ag...
- 72
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Competition Commission of India and Kapoor Glass in Abuse of Dominance Case — No Abuse Found in Volume Discounts and Contractual Terms by Dominant Glass Tubing Manufacturer. The court held that volume discounts are not per se abusive under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, and that the evidence did not establish anti-competitive foreclosure or refusal to supply.
30 Jun 2025The case arises from an information filed by Kapoor Glass India Pvt. Ltd. on 25 May 2010 under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, alleging that ...
- 283
