Search Results for "Central Government exclusive jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Central Government exclusive jurisdiction"

1020 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1020 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Heard Multiple Petitions Seeking Quashing of Criminal Proceedings for Offences under MMRD Act and IPC Together Due to Common Question of Law. Petitioners assailed registration of cases under both special enactment and general penal code as impermissible, invoking inherent jurisdiction of the High Court.

6 Feb 2019

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, heard twelve connected criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,...

High Court

High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench Considers Confirmation of Death Sentence Awarded in Sessions Trial for Kidnapping and Murder of Minor Child. Conviction Under Sections 364A, 302, 201 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen, Ransom Call, and Discovery of Body Under Section 27 Evidence Act.

5 May 2016

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench was seized of a confirmation case (Criminal Confirmation Case No. 1 of 2016) and two connected cr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Inclusion of Voters in Cooperative Society Election, Upholds Bar Under Rule 78 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Elections to Committee) Rules, 2014. Remedy of Election Petition Under Section 91 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Held to Be Exclusive and Bar Writ Jurisdiction.

15 Jun 2015

The petitioners, members of Shivanand Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in MMDR Act Cases Due to Lack of Authorisation. Police Registration of FIR for Mining Offences Without Competent Authority's Complaint Held Invalid Under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

6 Feb 2019

A batch of criminal petitions was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench, seek...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Petitions Challenging the Validity of Police-Initiated Criminal Proceedings under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. Alleged that Police Officers Had No Jurisdiction to Investigate or File Charge-sheet for Offences under the Act, Which Require Complaints by Authorized Officers.

6 Feb 2019

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State Government's Appeal in Cinema Licence Dispute Under Punjab Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1952. The Licensing Authority Has Exclusive Power to Decide Licence Applications in the First Instance, and the State Government's Control Under Section 5(2) Cannot Be Exercised to Directly Adjudicate Applications.

9 Dec 1965

The dispute arose from an application by Hari Krishan Sharma for a licence to construct a permanent cinema hall under the Punjab Cinemas (Regulation) ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Daughter's Claim for Share in Compensation for Land Acquired from Scheduled Tribe Coparcenary — Hindu Succession Act Not Applicable to Scheduled Tribes Under Section 2(2). Court holds that law prevails over equity and it is for the legislature to amend Section 2(2) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 to extend benefits to Scheduled Tribe women.

9 Dec 2022

The dispute arose from the acquisition of land originally belonging to late Satyananda Negi, a common ancestor of the parties, who were members of a S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Authorities in Madras Urban Land Tax Act — Act Held Constitutionally Valid. Levy of 0.4% on Market Value of Urban Land Under Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966 Not Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(f), and Retrospective Operation Reasonable.

11 Apr 1969

The case concerned the constitutional validity of the Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966, which levied a tax on urban land at 0.4% of its market value. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Constitutional Challenge to Service Tax on Advocates. The Levy Under Section 65(105)(zzzzm) of the Finance Act, 1994 is Challenged as Ultra Vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 265 of the Constitution.

15 Dec 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Originating Summons for Partition of HUF Property — Plaintiffs Fail to Establish Exclusive Ownership of Mazgaon Property. Court holds that property sold in 2007 was HUF property and proceeds were distributed among all coparceners, including daughters, under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

27 Feb 2017

The case concerns an Originating Summons filed by Kishore Morarji Bhojraj and Ramesh Morarji Shah (Plaintiffs) against Jaya Hiranchand Karani, Anju Kr...

58 59 60 61 62

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)