Search Results for "vehicle control"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "vehicle control"

1190 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1190 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Limits Owner's Liability to Rs. 50,000 Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Claimants' Failure to Prove Negligence Renders Claim Under Section 166 Unsustainable; Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication Under No-Fault Provision.

30 Nov -0001

The present appeals arise out of a motor accident claim case. The appellant in First Appeal No.523 of 2016, Pawan s/o Gulchand Musale, is the owner of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Condition Requiring Marathi Language Knowledge for Auto Rickshaw Permits as Ultra Vires the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Imposition of Such a Condition Lacked Statutory Backing Under Sections 73 and 74 of the Act and Rule 24 of the Maharashtra Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 Only Applied to Driver's Badges.

1 Mar 2017

The litigation arose from a group of writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging a condition imposed by the State of Maharashtra req...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Tribunal's Failure to Consider Evidence — Claimants Entitled to Compensation Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Court held that under Section 163A, the claimant need not prove negligence, and the Tribunal erred in dismissing the claim on the ground that the offending vehicle was not identified.

12 Jan 2026

The present appeal was filed by the original claimants, being the wife, major children, and parents of the deceased Shantilal Kalabhai Garasia, a Poli...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses KSRTC Appeals in Motor Accident Claims — Compensation Awards Upheld as Just and Proper. Claimant Bellappa awarded Rs.3,20,800 and Rs.13,444 for injuries sustained in two separate accidents involving KSRTC buses; court finds no grounds for interference under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

28 Sep 2016

The Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) filed three appeals under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Cancellation of Vehicle Registration in Customs Duty Evasion Case — Petitioner Not a Bona Fide Purchaser Without Notice. Registration Cancellation Under Section 55(5) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Upheld as Vehicle Was Fraudulently Imported Availing Customs Duty Exemption for Diplomatic Officer.

2 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Imran Humayun Chandiwala, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 9 September ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163-A Motor Vehicles Act — Owner's Death in Single-Vehicle Accident Covered Under No Fault Liability. The court held that the claim under Section 163-A is maintainable even if the deceased is the owner of the vehicle and no other vehicle is involved, as the scheme is based on no fault liability.

6 Dec 2006

The case involves an appeal by the United India Insurance Company Ltd. against the judgment and order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Wardha, w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163A MV Act — No Fault Liability Principle Precludes Defence of Victim's Negligence. The Court held that the defence of wrongful act or neglect of the victim is not available in proceedings under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as the provision is a complete code based on no fault liability.

6 Feb 2014

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 15th June 2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai in M.A.C.P. No. 2554 of 1995. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Temporary Authorisation and NOC for Vehicles with Cancelled Fitness Certificates. Authorities Directed to Accept Tax Dues and Issue No Objection Certificate Under Section 48 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

2 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Geekom Logistech Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in transport business, owned a fleet of vehicl...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Upholds Consumer Fora Orders for Compensation. Ownership of Vehicle Not Transferred Despite Sale Agreement; Insurer Liable to Pay Claim Amount with Interest.

18 Jun 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Surendra Kumar Bhilawe against The New India Assurance Company Limited, setting aside the National Commi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows BH Series Registration for Petitioner's Motor Car Under Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. Denial of Registration Without Written Reasons Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

12 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Shri Mahendra Bansilal Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the action of the Commi...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)