Search Results for "transit accommodation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "transit accommodation"

82 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 82 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Court Receiver in Redevelopment Dispute. Court holds that disputes regarding possession of flats by dissenting members are not arbitrable under the agreement and that the developer failed to establish a prima facie case for interim relief.

10 Feb 2016

The petitioner, Aditya Developers, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a Court Rece...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Petition for Interim Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act — Dispute Over Possession of Flats for Redevelopment Not Arbitrable as Members Not Bound by Development Agreement. The court held that interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, cannot be granted against persons who are not parties to the arbitration agreement, and the members of the society were not bound by the arbitration clause in the development agreement.

8 May 2015

The petitioner, Shri Krishan Sai Development Corporation, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Petition Challenging Stop Work Notice in Slum Redevelopment Project. Corporation's Notice Under Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Quashed for Non-Compliance with DCR 33(7) Prior Approval Requirement.

10 Jun 2013

The petitioner, M/s Crescent Property Developers, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against City Civil Court's Order Holding Lack of Jurisdiction in Suit for Declaration of Joint Entitlement to Slum Rehabilitation Premises. The court remanded the matter for fresh consideration on jurisdiction, emphasizing that the issue must be decided based on pleadings and the nature of the suit.

9 Apr 2013

The appellant, Ashok B. Nigudkar, filed a suit in the City Civil Court, Mumbai seeking a declaration that he was jointly entitled along with the defen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition Seeking Appointment of Court Receiver for Possession of Flats for Demolition and Reconstruction. Court holds that disputes regarding redevelopment of a cooperative housing society are not arbitrable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as they involve statutory rights and obligations under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

18 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Bharat Infrastructure and Engineering Pvt. Ltd., a builder and developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Developer Removal in Slum Rehabilitation Case Due to Bias — Participation of CEO in Appellate Committee Violates Natural Justice. CEO who passed initial removal order cannot sit as member of High Power Committee hearing appeal against his own order under Slum Rehabilitation Authority regulations.

14 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Susme Builders Private Limited, a developer, was selected by the respondent Co-operative Society in 1986 for redevelopment of its prop...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Cooperative Society's Right to Develop Land in Siddharth Nagar, Rejects MHADA's Claim of Ownership. The court held that the cooperative society representing occupants of Patra chawls is entitled to development rights over 10 acres of land as per government resolution, and MHADA cannot unilaterally terminate the development agreement.

10 Feb 2011

The case involves a dispute over the development of land in Siddharth Nagar, Goregaon, Mumbai. The Bombay Housing and Area Development Board (now MHAD...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to SRA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. CEO's Direction to Process Letter of Intent Upheld as 70% Consent of Eligible Members Was Validly Obtained Under DCR 33(10).

28 Jan 2011

The case involves a slum rehabilitation scheme under DCR 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai. The petitioners, Lokhandwal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.

17 Oct 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Cancellation — Petitioner Failed to Establish Eligibility Under SRA Regulations. The court upheld the decision of the High Power Committee cancelling the scheme as the petitioners could not prove their residence prior to the cut-off date.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, M/s. Platinum Realty and M/s. Jaihind SRA Cooperative Society (Proposed), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)