Search Results for "tort"

324 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 324 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree for Unlawful Subletting and Rent Default. Tenant's Claim of Assignment of Tenancy Rights Fails for Lack of Consent of Landlord and Non-Production of Evidence.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Ratnadeep Shankar Narkar (Applicant/Defendant No.2) challenging the judgment and decree dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Dealer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Dealer Not Liable as Owner Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Dealership Agreement Cannot Shift Statutory Liability of Manufacturer for Third-Party Compensation.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Vaibhav Jain, the proprietor of M/s Vaibhav Motors, a dealer of Hindustan Motors Pvt. Ltd. The case aros...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Doctor in Medical Negligence Case — Lack of Expert Opinion and Prima Facie Case Under Section 304-A IPC. FIR and charge-sheet quashed as no expert opinion obtained to establish medical negligence.

The applicant, Dr. Pramod Yashwantrao Gurjar, an Obstetric and Gynecology Surgeon, performed a cesarean surgery on Smt. Kanchan Atul Kulkarni on 06.03...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Execution of Foreign Decree Case, Holding Limitation Period of 12 Years Runs from Date of Foreign Decree. Bank of Baroda's Execution Petition Filed 14 Years After London Decree Held Time-Barred Under Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a dispute between Bank of Baroda (appellant) and Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. (respondent, successor of Vysya Bank) regarding the limita...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Eviction Decree in Favour of Court Receiver — Tenancy Rights Not Extinguished by Consent Terms. The Court held that the Court Receiver could not evict the defendants as trespassers without due process, as the consent terms did not terminate their tenancy rights.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 22nd February 2010 passed by the Bombay City Civil Court in S.C.Suit No.1154 of 2000, decreeing the...