Search Results for "token compensation"

146 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 146 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Cheque Clearing Deficiency. Bank held liable for deficiency in service under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 due to negligence in presenting cheques within validity period, with compensation awarded for loss caused by expired cheques.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals filed by Canara Bank against a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses GSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation of Rs.24,93,000 for Leg Amputation. Negligence of ST Bus Driver Solely Responsible Despite Non-Joinder of Driver and Insurer; No Contributory Negligence by Motorcyclist.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by Babubhai Jasabhai Maru (the claimant) under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of Pune Development Control Rules Allowing Municipal Takeover of Private Open Spaces for ₹1 Compensation. Petitioners Claim Violation of Right to Property under Article 300A and Lack of Statutory Basis in BPMC Act.

Five writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of the Development Control Rules ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Appeal by GSRTC in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Award of Rs.24,93,000 for Amputation of Leg. ST Bus Driver Held Solely Negligent; No Contributory Negligence by Motorcyclist Established Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by Babubhai Jasabhai Maru (the claimant) under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Proceedings Against Timber Purchasers for Fire-Destroyed Goods. Property in Timber Not Passed to Purchasers Under Sale of Goods Act, 1930, Hence No Liability Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

The petitioners, fifteen timber merchants, participated in an auction conducted by the Forest Department on 16.04.2008 and 15.05.2008 for the purchase...