Search Results for "tax refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "tax refund"

1154 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1154 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition on Interest on Refund Under Goa VAT Act — Interest Payable from Date of Assessment Order Determining Refund. Section 33(2) of the Goa Value Added Tax Act, 2005 mandates interest from the date the amount became refundable, which is the date of the assessment order, not the date of actual refund.

16 Oct 2019

The petitioner, United Spirits Ltd. (formerly McDowell and Co. Ltd.), a registered dealer under the Goa Value Added Tax Act, 2005, filed returns for t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Octroi on Computer Software in Classification Dispute. Software Held to Be Separate Goods from Hardware Under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1988 and Octroi Rules.

11 Oct 2005

The petitioner, Tata Information Systems Ltd. (now IBM Global Services India Private Limited), was engaged in the manufacture, import, sale, and marke...

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Indian Bank's Appeals in Insolvency Case — Income Tax Refund Held as Part of Corporate Debtor's Assets, Not Subject to Set-off by Bank. The Tribunal upheld the liquidator's right to recover the refund amount, ruling that the bank's claim of set-off under Section 14 of IBC was not maintainable after moratorium.

10 Mar 2025

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed two appeals filed by Indian Bank challenging orders dated 19.12.2024 passed by the Natio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revisional Order Under Section 57 of Bombay Sales Tax Act — Refund of Tax on Gas Hot Plates Upheld as Exempted Goods Under Entry 164[1][v]. The court held that the Assistant Commissioner erred in revising the refund order without properly considering the exemption notification, and the petitioner was entitled to refund of tax paid on exempted goods.

6 Jun 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Shiv Shyam Sales Enterprises, a partnership firm dealing in gas hot plates as importer and retailer, filed a writ petition under ...

High Court

High Court Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 13. The Debt Recovery Tribunal has inherent power to order refund of court fees under Section 13 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 when the main petition is disposed of as infructuous.

19 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 Applicable. The court held that the DRT erred in rejecting the refund application without considering Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, which provides for refund when a case becomes infructuous.

19 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty on Cancelled Development Agreement Under Section 47(c)(5) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner entitled to refund as transaction was cancelled before possession and within two years, not covered by Section 48 proviso.

3 Sep 2025

The Petitioner, M/s. Satyam Construction, entered into a Development Agreement on 2 June 2011 with Shri Rajiv Ghule and others for development of land...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Taxpayer Against Non-Processing of Income Tax Returns and Refund Claims. Mandamus Issued to Process Returns Under Section 143(1) Within Four Weeks, Subject to Section 143(1D) and Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 2020

The appellant, Vodafone Idea Ltd. (formerly Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd), is a telecommunications company that filed income tax returns for Assessmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Refund of Excess Recovery in Income Tax Stay Matter — Petitioner Voluntarily Paid 20% Demand, Revenue Adjusted Refund Beyond Permitted Limit. Adjustment of Refund Against Stayed Demand Violates Instruction No.1914 and Stay Order Dated 17 April 2024.

24 Feb 2025

The petitioner, an individual, filed his return of income for assessment year 2015-2016 on 28 September 2015, declaring income of Rs.56,65,660/-. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of CVD Paid on Imported Mobile Phones Under Exemption Notification. The court held that the exemption notification No.12/2012-Customs applies to imports and directed reconsideration of refund claims subject to verification of unjust enrichment.

30 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Micromax Informatics Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, imported mobile handsets during July 2014 to June 2015 and...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)