Search Results for "stick"

783 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 783 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Arms Act Violation in Land Dispute Shooting. Appellant-accused fired two rounds from a revolver at the deceased, causing death, and the court confirmed life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC and Section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959.

The case arises from a land dispute that led to a fatal shooting. On 07.06.2012, the complainant and his son Nagjiji were at their agricultural field ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Police Inspector for Custodial Death but Modifies Offence from Murder to Culpable Homicide. Death of an accused in police custody due to multiple injuries inflicted by police officers resulted in conviction under Section 304 Part I IPC instead of Section 302 IPC.

The case pertains to the custodial death of Jeeva, who surrendered at Amraiwadi Police Station on 10th June 1992. The appellant, Vinod Jaswantray Vyas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Intent. Conviction under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Showed Only Simple Injuries and Witness Testimony Was Contradictory.

The case arises from an incident on 27.2.2002, where the victim Kapil Dhage (PW9) was allegedly assaulted by the appellants Pankaj Gaikwad and Vijay T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly and Common Objection Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302, 324 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish that the appellants shared a common object to commit murder.

The appeal arises from the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Biloli, in Sessions Case No. 27/1994, convicting the appellants for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly Not Proved and Benefit of Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302, 324 read with 149 IPC set aside as common object not established beyond reasonable doubt.

The case arises from a criminal appeal against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Biloli, in Sessions Case No. 27/1994, convicting the app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Police Assault Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 332, 353 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Presence and Role of Appellants Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, five individuals, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for offences under Sections 332 and 353 read with Section 14...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits All Appellants in Rioting and Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 302/149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The case arises from an incident on 25th April 1991 at about 7:00 p.m. in village Jalgaon-Supe, Taluka Baramati, District Pune, where a group of 30-40...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Converts Conviction of Accused from Culpable Homicide to Grievous Hurt in Land Dispute Murder Case. Single Blow with Stick Held Not Amounting to Murder or Culpable Homicide, Acquittal of Five Co-Accused Upheld Under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 IPC.

The case arises from a land dispute between the Rahmatkar family. On 12 August 2002 at 2:30 PM, at village Bhadrutola, Karanja, an altercation occurre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish the presence of all accused at the scene and the common intention to cause death.

The judgment arises from three appeals against a common judgment and order dated 14.2.2008 of the learned Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, in Sessions Case...