Search Results for "statutory deadline"

212 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 212 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Drug Manufacturer in NSQ Case Due to Prejudicial Delay in Testing. Delay of 20 Months in Analysis of Drug Sample Violated Right to Challenge Government Analyst's Report Under Section 25(3) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

The criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, was filed by M/s Zim Laboratories Ltd. and its officers (the manufact...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Educational Institution Seeking Inclusion in Centralized Admission Process Despite Late AICTE Approval. State and Director of Technical Education Directed to Include College in Centralized Admission for Automobile Engineering Course for Academic Year 2011-2012.

The petitioner, Dattakala Shikshan Sanstha's Dattakala Group of Institution, Faculty of Engineering, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Challenge to Arbitral Award in Reclamation Work Contract Dispute. Petition Filed Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Seeking to Set Aside Award for Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

The petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the Board of Trustees of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Insolvency Notice Based on Foreign Judgment — Notice Held Without Jurisdiction as Debt Not Payable Under Indian Insolvency Act. Foreign judgment debt not enforceable under Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 without satisfying conditions of Section 13 CPC.

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by the Judgment Debtor, Neville Tuli, seeking to set aside an Insolvency Notice No. N/28 of 2011 issued by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Concerning Forfeiture of Bid Securities in Tender Process. The Petition Questions Whether the Arbitrator Correctly Interpreted Clause 19.6 of the Tender Instructions and the Law on Bank Guarantees.

The dispute arose out of a tender process floated by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited for supply, construction, and comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by MSEDCL in Electricity Tariff Dispute Over Change in Law Due to Wildlife Notification. Held that the notification declaring buffer zone around Tadoba Tiger Reserve constituted a 'Change in Law' under PPAs, entitling APML to compensatory tariff for all four PPAs.

The present appeals arise from a dispute between Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the appellant, and Adani Power M...