Search Results for "stamp duty refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "stamp duty refund"

226 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 226 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Refusal to Register Sale Deeds for Non-Production of No Objection Certificate from Municipal Council. Held that the Sub-Registrar cannot refuse registration solely on the ground of absence of NOC from the Municipal Council under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

15 Jul 2026

The petitioners filed writ petitions challenging the refusal of the Sub-Registrar, Bodvad, to register sale deeds executed in their favor on the groun...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand Against Developer in Leasehold Development Agreement — Development Agreement Not Conveyance Under Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958. The Court held that a development agreement that does not transfer ownership or leasehold rights is not an instrument of conveyance under Section 2(g) of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, and thus not chargeable to stamp duty.

17 Mar 2026

The petitioner, M/s Vaibhav Corp. Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Stamp Duty on Renewal of Perpetual Lease Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Levy of stamp duty on renewal of perpetual lease is not manifestly arbitrary or violative of Articles 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India.

14 Oct 2025

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur, through a division bench comprising Justices Anil S. Kilor and Rajnish R. Vyas, dismissed two writ petitions challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in RERA Refund Dispute — Joint Developer Not Liable for Refund of Amounts Not Received. The court held that under Sections 12 and 18 of RERA, only a promoter who has received payment can be directed to refund, and joint and several liability cannot be imposed without statutory basis.

26 Feb 2024

The case involves a dispute under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) regarding the refund of amounts paid by an allottee to...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Collector to Consider Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Unconsummated Sale Agreement Due to Covid-19 Pandemic. Petitioner entitled to refund under Section 52 read with 52A of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as no instrument was executed and transaction fell through.

7 Jan 2023

The petitioner, Deepti Kavit Ved, desired to purchase Flat No.707, 'B' Wing, Nishchy Building for a total consideration of Rs.74 Lakhs from M/s. Shree...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging RBI's Moratorium and Liquidation of CKP Co-operative Bank Ltd. — Petitioners' Deposits Not Covered by Deposit Insurance as Bank Was Under Moratorium Prior to Insurance Scheme Introduction.

12 Mar 2021

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by depositors of the CKP Co-operative Bank Ltd., which was placed under moratorium by the Res...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Impounding of Unstamped Agreement in Specific Performance Suit Pending for 29 Years — Refund of Stamp Duty on Cancelled Conveyance Permitted. The court held that impounding under Section 35 of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 is discretionary and would be unjust where appellant had already paid stamp duty on a conveyance that was cancelled due to setting aside of consent decree.

4 Oct 2019

The case arises from a dispute over a tea estate. The appellant, M/s Terai Tea Company Limited, entered into an agreement to sell dated 15th January 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Temporary Injunction in Specific Performance Suit — Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Found in Favour of Plaintiff-Builder Under Memorandum of Understanding. The court held that the Memorandum of Understanding dated 21.5.2011 constituted a binding agreement for sale and the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case for grant of injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

5 May 2017

The appellant, M/s. Merces Builders Private Limited, filed an appeal against an order dated 16.4.2016 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Panaji...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Bombay Stamp Act Provisions on Sale Certificates in Execution Proceedings. Interpretation of 'Instrument' under Section 147 of Delhi Municipal Corporation Act Not Extended to Bombay Stamp Act.

16 Mar 2011

The case involves a reference under Section 113 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, made by the Principal District Judge, Aurangabad, to the Bombay ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Notice for Stamp Duty on Mortgage Deed Executed by Cooperative Society Under Government Remission Order. Government Order for Remission of Stamp Duty Dated 19.3.1990 Held Binding on Authorities Despite Subsequent Audit Objection.

11 Jan 2005

The petitioner, Yashwantrao Chavan Shetkari Sahakari Soot Girni Maryadit, a cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)