Search Results for "set aside award"

6538 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6538 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Interest Rate Reduced from 18% to 9%. The court held that the arbitrator's award did not violate public policy but reduced the interest rate as excessive under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award dated 8 October 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petitions Challenging Two IPL Franchise Arbitration Awards. Arbitral Tribunal Had Directed Payment of Rs.384.83 Crore and Return of Rs.153.34 Crore Bank Guarantee with 18% Interest, Which the Franchisor Contested on Jurisdictional and Merits Grounds.

The dispute arose from the Indian Premier League (IPL) franchise agreements between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and the Kochi fra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Concerning Forfeiture of Bid Securities in Tender Process. The Petition Questions Whether the Arbitrator Correctly Interpreted Clause 19.6 of the Tender Instructions and the Law on Bank Guarantees.

The dispute arose out of a tender process floated by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited for supply, construction, and comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor/Developer's Challenge to Majority Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute. Court upholds award of Rs.7,35,000, Rs.10,80,000, interest, and costs under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, M/s. Raviuday Construction Co., a partnership firm, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 15 May 2012 passed by a three-member ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

APPEAL NO.662 OF 1995

The appeal arises from a judgment and order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 18 January 1996 in Arbitration Petition No.184 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute — Restores Arbitral Award for Compensation for Unproductive Use of Machinery. Court Holds That High Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting Its Own View.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s. Dyna Technologies Pvt. Ltd. against the judgment of the Madras High Court, which had set aside an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Foreign Company in Arbitration Dispute — Holds That Foreign Award Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Challenge to Foreign Award Lies Only Under Sections 47-48 for Enforcement, Overruling Bombay High Court's Reliance on Bhatia International.

The appellant, Noy Vallesina Engineering SpA (now Noy Ambiente S.p.a), an Italian company, challenged a judgment of the Bombay High Court which held t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 4 OF 1986

The petition filed under sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, sought to challenge an interim award and certain directions issued by the so...