Search Results for "selected candidates"

1231 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1231 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Candidates Seeking Appointment from Expired Ranked List. No Right to Appointment Arises After Ranked List Expiry, Even for Vacancies Reported Later.

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals filed by candidates empanelled in the first Ranked List (RLI) dated 11.9.2013 for the post of Sub...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Promotion Select List for District Judges in Gujarat — Merit-cum-Seniority Principle Upheld. High Court's Suitability Test Components and Weightage Valid Under Rule 5 of Gujarat State Judicial Service Rules, 2005.

The Supreme Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the Select List dated 10.03.2023 issued by the High Court of Gujarat for prom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Horizontal Reservation Filling Rules and Migration of Reserved Category Candidates to General Category Seats. Court Considers Challenge to Government Circular Permitting Reserved Category Candidates to Compete for Unreserved Seats on Merit.

The judgment from the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) addressed a group of writ petitions concerning the proper method for filling vacancies unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Departmental Promotion Committee Recommendations in Postal Department Recruitment. Court Holds That Candidates Who Were Not Considered for Promotion Due to Non-Inclusion of Their Names in the Zone of Consideration Must Be Considered Afresh.

The petitioners, a group of 86 individuals employed in various capacities such as Postal Assistant, Sorting Assistant, Postman, and Mail Guard in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Parity in Sub-Inspector Selection. The Court held that the benefit granted to 133 candidates under Article 142 was not a precedent and cannot be claimed by others who failed or did not appear in the physical test.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India by candidates seeking appointment to the post of S...