Search Results for "section 351"

574 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 574 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Clarifies Legislative Competence on Alcohol Regulation: Potable vs Industrial Alcohol" "A landmark judgment addressing the scope of State and Union powers on regulating alcohol under the Indian Constitution."

The Supreme Court of India revisited the legislative competence concerning the regulation of alcohol under the Constitution. The court examined whethe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Proceedings Against Relatives and Friends in Bigamy Case for Lack of Evidence of Common Intention. Essential Ingredients of Section 494 IPC Not Made Out Against Non-Spouse Accused Without Proof of Knowledge of Subsisting Marriage.

The Supreme Court allowed appeals by special leave against the judgment of the Kerala High Court which had rejected the appellants' petition to quash ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Commercial Construction. Court upholds MCGM's action under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for building without valid permission and in violation of development plan reservations.

The petitioners, Kamla Industrial Park Ltd and Metallica Industries Ltd, challenged the demolition notice and stop-work notice issued by the Municipal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Refusal of Injunction in Municipal Demolition Case — Structure Claimed to Be Pre-1962 Protected Property. Court Holds That Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief Exists Where Structure Allegedly Existed Prior to Cut-Off Date Under Section 351 of MMC Act, 1888.

The appellant, M/s Masjid Wa Madrasa Fatimatu Zohra (Ra) Trust, filed an appeal against an order of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, dated 21 September 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC Demolition Notice Under Section 351 of MMC Act — No Interim Relief for Unauthorized Structure Occupant. Tenancy Agreement from 1962 Does Not Confer Right to Continue Occupation After Notice Under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

The appellant, Michael Mascarenhas, filed an appeal challenging an order dated 30.07.2016 passed by the City Civil Court, Dindoshi, Mumbai, which reje...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Shop Structure. Tenant Failed to Prove Authorization Under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, and Withdrawal of Earlier Notice Did Not Bar Fresh Action.

The appellant, Maneklal N. Shah alias Kothari, was the original plaintiff in a suit filed against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Court Order for Retrenchment Compensation Under Section 33(c)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Employer Liable Despite Nationalization and Transfer of Undertaking.

The petitioner, Empress Mills (a unit of Maharashtra State Textile Corporation), challenged an order dated 14.12.1998 passed by the First Labour Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Municipal Corporation Dispute — Suit Barred by Limitation. Notice under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 issued in 1994; suit filed in 2001 held time-barred as cause of action arose on notice date.

The appellant, Satish Dalichand Shah, claimed to be a monthly tenant of a shop premises in Mumbai. On 23rd May, 1994, the Municipal Corporation of Gre...